On 13/04/17 19:19, Curt Spann wrote: > CES: Did you really intended for the ‘either/both’ instead of just > ‘both'? I don’t think it would be a good idea to only have a > certificate’s revoked status in one form the of the revocation data > and not the other.
I think that's really shorthand for "all the revocation methods which are BR-required and any of your choice which are BR-allowed for that particular certificate". Gerv _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
