On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:25 AM, philliph--- via Public < [email protected]> wrote:
> I am finding the arguments here rather surprising. > > When counting an election, the questions at issue are always > > 1) Is the person permitted to cast a ballot > 2) What was their intent > > So to dismiss ‘intent’ as irrelevant is off the point, to say the least. > > In this case we have the concern that there is an audit log so that the > votes are public. Which is of course a reasonable requirement. But one that > is surely adequately met by post ballot publication. No, it's not met by our Bylaws. Phillip, this isn't a matter of debating intent. We have Bylaws that govern this. They were not followed. Are you representing official Comodo opinion that believes we do not need to follow our Bylaws?
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
