This is excellent work and helps people understand each method a lot better.
- Thanks! Let me know if you disagree with anything. 

"The CA MUST record the subsection and version of the Baseline Requirements 
used to validate an Applicant’s control over each FQDN included in an issued 
certificate" 
When is this expected to become effective?
- Immediately after the IPR period expires

In methods 3.2.2.4.1, 3.2.2.4.2, 3.2.2.4.3,  b (2), you say that the CA must 
verify that the WHOIS information for the Base Domain has not changed since the 
CA performed the verification process. Is this the WHOIS information record 
itself or should CAs be looking for the Domain Contact to appear in the WHOIS 
record? I'm asking because some WHOIS databases do not release Domain Contact 
information and CAs require an official document from the Domain Registrar that 
contains information about the domain owner and contacts for the initial domain 
validation.
- Right now the time period in that section specifies the Domain  language 825 
days so it’s identical to the verification period. I put this in explicitly in 
case we wanted to reduce the period to of WHOIS re-confirmation to a lesser 
period (such as 90 days?). It should have said WHOIS or Domain Registrar though 
instead of just WHOIS. I also don’t mind dropping bullet point 2 if everyone is 
opposed to a WHOIS/Domain Registrar refresh.

For example, this is the WHOIS record for example.gr:


Domain Name:example.gr
Domain Handle:dr-1234-gr
Protocol Number:1234
Creation Date:24-07-1997
Expiration Date:31-12-2017
Updated Date:05-11-2015
Registrar:FOO
Registrar Referral URL:http://www.FOO.gr
Registrar Email:[email protected] <mailto:Email:[email protected]> 
Registrar Telephone:+30.123456
Whois Server: 
Bundle Name:example.gr
Name Server:XXXX.example.gr
Name Server:XXXXXX.example.gr


According to your proposal, CAs only need to check if the record above has not 
changed?
- Yes. That is the point of bullet point 2. To try and address issues where 
domain ownership may have changed.


Also, there is a small typo in the 3rd paragraph of 3.2.2.4.2 a (FQNs --> 
FQDNs).
- Thanks!



 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to