On 17/05/17 19:33, Ryan Sleevi wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Gervase Markham <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > What's the alternative proposal, given that many or most CAs can't do > per-method rules right now? > > The proposed extension would be simply that the CAs which haven't > maintained those records can still signal a BR version 1.4.2 (or 1.4.1 > or equivalent). As they gather/complete such records, they can signal a > BR version 1.4.x.
You misunderstand me. If you want different data reuse rules (a separate question from encoding BR version in the certs), what would they be and how would they work? Or are you happy with the data reuse rules proposed? Gerv _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
