OATI Abstains on Ballot 201 as written below. OATI does not issue EV 
certificates.

Thanks.

With kind regards,

Patrick Tronnier
Principal Security Architect &
Sr. Director of Customer Support
Phone: 763.201.2000
Fax: 763.201.5333
Direct Line: 763.201.2052
Open Access Technology International, Inc.
3660 Technology Drive NE, Minneapolis, MN 55418


CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION: This email and any attachment(s) contain confidential 
and/or proprietary information of Open Access Technology International, Inc. Do 
not copy or distribute without the prior written consent of OATI. If you are 
not a named recipient to the message, please notify the sender immediately and 
do not retain the message in any form, printed or electronic.


From: Public [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ben Wilson via 
Public
Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 3:50 PM
To: CABFPub <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: Ben Wilson <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL][cabfpub] Ballot 201 - .onion Revisions


Ballot 201 - .Onion Revisions

This ballot is meant to cure any potential problems with Ballot 198, which may 
have been invalid due to ambiguities in what was presented to the Forum for 
vote. This Ballot 201 attempts to clarify Appendix F of the EV Guidelines 
concerning the Tor Service Descriptor Hash extension and that inclusion of the 
extension in the TBSCertificate is required.

The following motion has been proposed by Jeremy Rowley of DigiCert and 
endorsed by Ryan Sleevi of Google and Wayne Thayer of GoDaddy to introduce new 
Final Maintenance Guidelines for the "Guidelines for the Issuance and 
Management of Extended Validation Certificates" (EV Guidelines).

Attached is a PDF with a redline showing how Appendix F of the current EV 
Guidelines will be amended.

-- MOTION BEGINS --

Part 1:

The CA/Browser Forum, recognizing that Ballot 198 did not include a redline 
version against the current Final Maintenance Guidelines, thereby constitutes 
an invalid Ballot. As a consequence, the Forum agrees that the changes shall 
not be made to the appropriate Final Maintenance Guideline, and as such, no IPR 
Review Notice is in force for Ballot 198:

Part 2:

Revise Appendix F, Section 1, to read as follows:

Appendix F - Issuance of Certificates for .onion Domain Names

A CA may issue an EV Certificate with .onion in the right-most label of the 
Domain Name provided that issuance complies with the requirements set forth in 
this Appendix:

1. CAB Forum Tor Service Descriptor Hash extension (2.23.140.1.31)

The CA MUST include the CAB Forum Tor Service Descriptor Hash in the 
TBSCertificate to convey hashes of keys related to .onion addresses. The CA 
MUST include the Tor Service Descriptor Hash extension using the following 
format:

cabf-TorServiceDescriptorHash OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { 2.23.140.1.31 }

SEQUENCE ( 1..MAX ) of TorServiceDescriptorHash

TorServiceDescriptorHash:: = SEQUENCE {
onionURI UTF8String

algorithm AlgorithmIdentifier

subjectPublicKeyHash BIT STRING

}

Where the AlgorithmIdentifier is a hashing algorithm (defined in RFC 6234) 
performed over the DER-encoding of an ASN.1 SubjectPublicKey of the .onion 
service and SubjectPublicKeyHash is the hash output.

--Motion Ends--

The procedure for approval of this Final Maintenance Guideline ballot is as 
follows (exact start and end times may be adjusted to comply with applicable 
Bylaws and IPR Agreement):

BALLOT 201 Status: Final Maintenance Guideline            Start time (22:00 
UTC)   End time (22:00 UTC)

Discussion (7 to 14 days)                                                       
    May 25, 2017                    June 1, 2017

Vote for approval (7 days)                                                      
   June 1, 2017                      June 8, 2017

If a vote of the Forum approves this ballot, the Chair will initiate a 30-day 
IPR Review Period by sending out an IPR Review Notice.

After 30 days of announcing the IPR Review period by the Chair:

(a)    If Exclusion Notice(s) are filed, this ballot approval is rescinded and 
a PAG will be created; or

(b)   If no Exclusion Notices are filed, this ballot becomes effective at end 
of the IPR Review Period.

>From Bylaw 2.3: If the Draft Guideline Ballot is proposing a Final Maintenance 
>Guideline, such ballot will include a redline or comparison showing the set of 
>changes from the Final Guideline section(s) intended to become a Final 
>Maintenance Guideline, and need not include a copy of the full set of 
>guidelines. Such redline or comparison shall be made against the Final 
>Guideline section(s) as they exist at the time a ballot is proposed, and need 
>not take into consideration other ballots that may be proposed subsequently, 
>except as provided in Bylaw Section 2.3(j).

Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the Public 
list. A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in the 
response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote to 
abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses will 
not be counted. The latest vote received from any representative of a voting 
member before the close of the voting period will be counted. Voting members 
are listed here: https://cabforum.org/members/

In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes cast by 
members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes cast by members in 
the browser category must be in favor. Quorum is half of the number of 
currently active Members, which is the average number of Member organizations 
that have participated in the previous three Forum-wide meetings (both 
teleconferences and face-to-face meetings).  Under Bylaw 2.2(g), at least the 
required quorum number must participate in the ballot for the ballot to be 
valid, either by voting in favor, voting against, or abstaining.
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to