On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Gervase Markham <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 05/06/17 21:11, Peter Bowen wrote: > > What is the value of having a WG established by the F2F. The F2F can > discuss the topic all it wants with or without a WG charter. > > Well, it can, but the chances are that we'll end up with a rerun of the > last discussion at the previous F2F, where we all agree that there's a > problem and the next thing to do is to charter a working group. > > If we actually have a working group, we can gather expressions of > interest, perhaps even choose a chair, and the interested parties can > start defining a direction that their work will take them in. > I'm not sure I understand this. How does a WG promote that - since you could just as well accomplish the same in the F2F.
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
