On 17/06/17 01:06, Kirk Hall via Public wrote:> *Disclosure of SSL Technically-Constrained Sub-CAs in the CCADB* > Gerv
To help attendees: my goal for this session is to sample CA opinion on, and get information on the concrete pros, cons and knock-on effects of, the idea of requiring disclosure in the CCADB of SSL Technically Constrained Sub-CAs. Mozilla is considering this move to further improve the transparency of the ecosystem, and make sure everyone is on the same page about what appropriate technical constraints actually look like. > *Add BR-Required Self-Assessment - CA mapping of their CP/CPS to the BRs* > Gerv My goal for this session is to sample the assembled company's opinion on the idea that the CAB Forum should start maintaining a template document for mapping the BRs to a CP/CPS, and using the BRs to require the yearly or period completion/update of such a document. The aim would be to provide a resource that root programs can use for more quickly checking that a CP/CPS met the BRs, and so streamline root approvals, renewals, changes etc. Gerv _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
