I should point out that the pdfs I prepared to make review easier are NOT the official ballots - you should refer to the official ballots when the time comes to vote, not these pdfs.
From: Kirk Hall Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 2:07 PM To: 'CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List' <[email protected]> Subject: Ballots 202 and 190 Peter has put together two ballots, Ballot 202 (now in the discussion period, ending Wed.) and 190, and presented them as track changes in the entire BRs. I have created the attached pdfs that only include the pages with changes (I think - Peter, double check me) for easier review. Certain changes, like the revision of the important new definition of Authorization Domain Name, affect both ballots. This is an unusual situation - Ballot 202 will likely be voted on first, so Peter has assumed Ballot 202 passes and includes all the 202 changes in his Ballot 190. So I recommend people start by reviewing 202, and then 190 knowing it includes those changes from 202. I also attach my last version of Ballot 190 v6 so we can make sure 202/190 include all the necessary changes. I have not had time to review these ballots in detail yet, but given how little time we have before voting starts, I encourage others to review them quickly and forward any questions / comments. Because this affects domain validation rules, we want to make sure we get this right.
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
