My apologies – I thought it was a pre-ballot. Entrust votes yes
From: Public [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jos Purvis (jopurvis) via Public Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 6:48 AM To: Gervase Markham <[email protected]>; CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected]> Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: [cabfpub] Ballot 212: Canonicalise formal name of the Baseline Requirements Perhaps I missed the discussion of this on last week’s call, but is this ballot currently in the voting period or did it get held up at some point? It has a number and sponsors and we appear to have had some brief discussion on the list about it, but I’ve literally seen no one vote for it, so I’m wondering if it’s stuck and the discussion/voting period dates should be adjusted, or if no one has submitted a vote on it yet. :) -- Jos Purvis ([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>) .:|:.:|:. cisco systems | Cryptographic Services PGP: 0xFD802FEE07D19105 | +1 919.991.9114 (desk) From: Public <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on behalf of Gervase Markham via Public <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Reply-To: Gervase Markham <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Friday, 18 August, 2017 at 11:06 To: CABFPub <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: [cabfpub] Ballot 212: Canonicalise formal name of the Baseline Requirements Ballot 212: Canonicalise formal name of the Baseline Requirements Purpose of Ballot: to make the formal name of the Baseline Requirements document clear, as use is not currently consistent. The following motion has been proposed by Gervase Markham of Mozilla and endorsed by Jeremy Rowley of DigiCert and Ryan Sleevi of Google: -- MOTION BEGINS -- The official name of the Baseline Requirements document shall be 'The Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management of Publicly-Trusted Certificates'. Approved abbreviations for official use are "the Baseline Requirements", and "the BRs". Editors and maintainers of CAB Forum documents and websites are empowered to update text under their control at any time to make this so. -- MOTION ENDS -- The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows: Start time (22:00 UTC) End time (22:00 UTC) Discussion (7 to 14 days) 18 Aug 25 Aug Vote for approval (7 days) 25 Aug 1 Sep Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the Public list. A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in the response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote to abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses will not be counted. The latest vote received from any representative of a voting member before the close of the voting period will be counted. Voting members are listed here: https://cabforum.org/members/ In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes cast by members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes cast by members in the browser category must be in favor. Quorum is shown on CA/Browser Forum wiki. Under Bylaw 2.2(g), at least the required quorum number must participate in the ballot for the ballot to be valid, either by voting in favor, voting against, or abstaining.
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
