Correcting subject line to Ballot 214

From: Kirk Hall
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2017 5:55 PM
To: CA/Browser Forum Public Discussion List <public@cabforum.org>
Subject: Voting has started on Ballot 21 - CAA Discovery CNAME Errata

Voting has started on Ballot 214 – CAA Discovery CNAME Errata.

Technically, the Discussion period ended at 22:00 UTC today (which was 3:00 pm 
Pacific Time).  Josh, as the Proposer of the Ballot, accepted Gerv and Tim’s 
email suggestion as to a 3-month transition period, but this acceptance 
occurred at 5:05 pm Pacific Time, two hours after the end of the discussion 
period.  Also, we don’t have specific amendment language to consider, only a 
concept.

Regrettably, I think it’s too late for this transition period amendment, so we 
are voting on Ballot 214 as originally proposed (see below).  If there is a 
need for a transition period, I think it’s best if it’s proposed by a separate 
ballot with specific language.


From: Public [mailto:public-boun...@cabforum.org] On Behalf Of Jacob 
Hoffman-Andrews via Public
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 2:31 PM
To: CABFPub <public@cabforum.org<mailto:public@cabforum.org>>
Subject: [EXTERNAL][cabfpub] Ballot 214: CAA Discovery CNAME Errata

Kicking off the official discussion period for ballot 214 today per discussion 
with Phillip.

The following motion has been proposed by Phillip Hallam-Baker of Comodo Group 
Inc. and endorsed by Gervase Markham of Mozilla and Mads Egil Henriksveen of 
Buypass.

-- MOTION BEGINS --

In the Baseline Requirements v1.4.9 Section 3.2.2.8. CAA Records

Strike:

As part of the issuance process, the CA MUST check for a CAA record for each 
dNSName in the subjectAltName extension of the certificate to be issued, 
according to the procedure in RFC 6844, following the processing instructions 
set down in RFC 6844 for any records found. If the CA issues, they MUST do so 
within the TTL of the CAA record, or 8 hours, whichever is greater.

Replace with:

As part of the issuance process, the CA MUST check for CAA records and follow 
the processing instructions for any records found, for each dNSName in the 
subjectAltName extension of the certificate to be issued, as specified in RFC 
6844 as amended by Errata 5065 (Appendix A). If the CA issues, they MUST do so 
within the TTL of the CAA record, or 8 hours, whichever is greater.


In the Baseline Requirements ADD an Appendix A that reads:

Appendix A -- RFC6844 Errata 5065

The following errata report has been held for document update for RFC6844, "DNS 
Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) Resource Record".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5065

--------------------------------------
Status: Held for Document Update
Type: Technical

Reported by: Phillip Hallam-Baker 
<phill...@comodo.com<mailto:phill...@comodo.com>> Date Reported: 2017-07-10 
Held by: EKR (IESG)

Section: 4

Original Text
-------------
   Let CAA(X) be the record set returned in response to performing a CAA
   record query on the label X, P(X) be the DNS label immediately above
   X in the DNS hierarchy, and A(X) be the target of a CNAME or DNAME
   alias record specified at the label X.

   o  If CAA(X) is not empty, R(X) = CAA (X), otherwise

   o  If A(X) is not null, and R(A(X)) is not empty, then R(X) =
      R(A(X)), otherwise

   o  If X is not a top-level domain, then R(X) = R(P(X)), otherwise

   o  R(X) is empty.

Corrected Text
--------------
   Let CAA(X) be the record set returned in response to performing a CAA
   record query on the label X, P(X) be the DNS label immediately above
   X in the DNS hierarchy, and A(X) be the target of a CNAME or DNAME
   alias record chain specified at the label X.

   o  If CAA(X) is not empty, R(X) = CAA (X), otherwise

   o  If A(X) is not null, and CAA(A(X)) is not empty, then R(X) =
      CAA(A(X)), otherwise

   o  If X is not a top-level domain, then R(X) = R(P(X)), otherwise

   o  R(X) is empty.

  Thus, when a search at node X returns a CNAME record, the CA will
  follow the CNAME record chain to its target. If the target label
  contains a CAA record, it is returned.

  Otherwise, the CA continues the search at
  the parent of node X.

  Note that the search does not include the parent of a target of a
  CNAME record (except when the CNAME points back to its own path).

  To prevent resource exhaustion attacks, CAs SHOULD limit the length of
  CNAME chains that are accepted. However CAs MUST process CNAME
  chains that contain 8 or fewer CNAME records.

--Motion Ends--

The procedure for approval of this Final Maintenance Guideline ballot is as 
follows (exact start and end times may be adjusted to comply with applicable 
Bylaws and IPR Agreement):

BALLOT 214 Status:   Final Maintenance Guideline    Start time (22:00 UTC)    
End time (22:00 UTC)

Discussion begins now and ends September 20, 2017 22:00 UTC (7 days)

Vote for approval begins September 20, 2017 22:00 UTC and ends September 27, 
2017 22:00 UTC (7 days)

If vote approves ballot: Review Period (Chair to send Review Notice) (30 days). 
If Exclusion Notice(s) filed, ballot approval is rescinded and PAG to be 
created. If no Exclusion Notices filed, ballot becomes effective at end of 
Review Period.    Upon filing of Review Notice by Chair 30 days after filing of 
Review Notice by Chair

From Bylaw 2.3: If the Draft Guideline Ballot is proposing a Final Maintenance 
Guideline, such ballot will include a redline or comparison showing the set of 
changes from the Final Guideline section(s) intended to become a Final 
Maintenance Guideline, and need not include a copy of the full set of 
guidelines. Such redline or comparison shall be made against the Final 
Guideline section(s) as they exist at the time a ballot is proposed, and need 
not take into consideration other ballots that may be proposed subsequently, 
except as provided in Bylaw Section 2.3(j).

Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the Public 
list. A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in the 
response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote to 
abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses will 
not be counted. The latest vote received from any representative of a voting 
member before the close of the voting period will be counted. Voting members 
are listed here: https://cabforum.org/members/

In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes cast by 
members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes cast by members in 
the browser category must be in favor. Quorum is shown on CA/Browser Forum 
wiki. Under Bylaw 2.2(g), at least the required quorum number must participate 
in the ballot for the ballot to be valid, either by voting in favor, voting 
against, or abstaining.
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public@cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to