On Nov 21, 2017, at 7:03 AM, Gervase Markham via Public <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 03/11/17 23:23, Kirk Hall via Public wrote: >> This email is to lay out the course we want to follow to complete the >> technical specs for Redaction in the IETF, and also to address the >> recourse issues and consider appropriate changes to the Forum’s Baseline >> Requirements in response. > > In order to try and bring some light to this discussion, I have > attempted to summarise the arguments for and against CT redaction here: > https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA/CT_Redaction > > I can only extract data from recently-posted messages and IDs, so the > document is clearly incomplete. If you have an additional consideration > to add, or a response to an existing one, or want to improve the text, > feel free - it's a wiki. If you are unable or unwilling to get a login > (they do need approving, but it doesn't normally take long) then you can > send edits to me, although I reserve the right to edit your edits ;-)
Please do consider sharing the link to the file with the LAMPS WG in the IETF. It would help their discussion as well. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
