Final Minutes for CA/Browser Forum Teleconference – Nov. 30, 2017

Attendees: Arno Fiedler (D-TRUST), Atsushi Inaba (GlobalSign), Ben Wilson 
(DigiCert), Bruce Morton (Entrust), Christopher Kemmerer (SSL.com), Corey 
Bonnell (Trustwave), Curt Spann (Apple), Dean Coclin (DigiCert), Devon O’Brien 
(Google), Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA), Doug Beattie (GlobalSign), Enrico 
Entschew (D-TRUST), Fotis Loukos (SSL.com), Frank Corday (Trustwave), Jeremy 
Rowley (DigiCert), Jos Purvis (Cisco), Julie Olson (GlobalSign), Ken Myers 
(Federal PKI), Kirk Hall (Entrust), Neil Dunbar (Trustcor), Rick Andrews 
(DigiCert), Robin Alden (Comodo), Ryan Sleevi (Google), Shelley Brewer 
(DigiCert),Tim Hollebeek (DigiCert), Tim Shirley (Trustwave), Wayne Thayer 
(Mozilla), Wendy Brown (Federal PKI), Xiu Lei (GDCA).

1.           Roll Call

2.           Read Antitrust Statement

3.           Review Agenda.  Agenda was approved.

4.           Membership Application of Comodo Security Solutions, Inc. (CSS) as 
a browser.  Kirk said he, Ben, and Dean had reviewed the application of CSS to 
be a Forum member as a browser, and believe CSS qualifies under the Bylaws.  
Kirk also read an email from Gerv Markham of Mozilla saying that he had asked 
questions about the CSS application for information, but believed CSS qualifies 
under the current Bylaws also.  Ryan asked if the application included 
emergency contact information, and Dean said yes.  The members agreed by 
consensus to accept Comodo Security Solutions, Inc. as a browser member.

5.           Governance Change Working Group.  Dean said the WG had a call on 
Tuesday, and has finished the FAQ document.  Next step is to finish the edits 
to the Bylaws, which will likely occur on the next call.  The WG hopes to be 
finished by the holidays and then proceed with the ballot.

Ben said there was one minor issue – the Bylaws include two definitions for a 
CA member, one a Root CA and the other an Issuing CA, and the definitions are 
almost the same.  The WG may consider creating a merged definition for the 
future.  In past meetings, Virginia Fournier has recommended not making other 
general changes, but instead to stick to those changes necessary for the 
governance change in order to avoid complications.  Dean said the WG could 
clean up other things in the Bylaws, but doesn’t want to create objections by 
members.  Kirk suggested the WG could recommend other Bylaws changes if it was 
clear they were minor only and would not generate objections.  He asked if the 
first new WG charter (the new Web Server WG) was completed, and Dean said the 
charter was fairly close to completion.

6.           Policy Review Working Group update.  Ben said the WG had completed 
a call earlier that day, and was using GitHub for its suggested revisions.  The 
WG has completed new definitions for the key terms “Certification Authority” 
and “Trust Service Provider”, and was now going through the BRs to insert the 
new terms where they fit.  Dimitris noted that the new definitions had been 
circulated on the Public list on December 14, 2017, and the WG is moving 
forward.

7.           Network Security Working Group update.  Kirk noted that Bruce was 
again participating in the WG, and asked if Bruce would return to chairing the 
WG; Bruce said no.  Dimitris reported that the WG hadn’t been certain as to the 
threats to be addressed by the NetSec controls, so had formed a subgroup to try 
to define this better this so the WG would have a clearer roadmap for updating 
the NetSec requirements.  The subgroup has posted a document to Google 
spreadsheets to show the threats addressed and corresponding controls, and will 
report back to the WG with its results soon.  Kirk asked if the WG or subgroup 
had reached any conclusions yet about appropriate changes to the NetSec 
requirements, and Dimitris said no.

Ben said the WG had received an email from Josh Aas of Let’s Encrypt raising an 
inconsistency in the BRs and NetSec requirements concerning HSMs being FIPS 
compliant but then being patched with security updates that were not themselves 
certified as FIPS compliant, and the WG will work on that.  The WG will also 
review the definitional changes to the BRs and NetSec requirements being 
drafted by the Policy Review WG and decide if those changes will require 
further editing of the NetSec requirements.

8.           Validation Working Group update.  Jeremy said that due to his 
schedule he could no longer chair the WG, and had missed the last meeting.  
Kirk asked the WG members to volunteer if they were willing to become the 
chair.  Ben said that on its last call the WG considered CAA issues as a 
follow-up to the last F2F meeting discussion.  Rick had listened to the 
recording of the F2F meeting and had listed the open issues – perhaps the VWG 
should take them up.  Tim said he had an issue for the WG relating to random 
value tokens and nonces.

Ben noted that a number of VWG matters had been completed by successful ballots 
in prior weeks, but noted that two (relating to SRV names and IP address 
validation) were still pending.   Bruce has raised the need to remove outdated 
provisions from the BRs such as those addressing Internal Names and gTLDs – 
those provisions can now be deleted.  Bruce said he would circulate a proposal 
to the main list.


9.           Wiki on pros and cons of CT Redaction – additional comments.  Kirk 
said Gerv asked him to remind members to post any additional comments on the 
pros and cons of CT domain name redaction to the wiki.


10.         Possible CAA Working Group.  Kirk noted that the members seemed in 
favor of forming a CAA Working Group at their last F2F meeting to deal with 
open questions about CAA implementation, but it wasn’t clear if there was in 
fact support.  He noted that a number of CAA issues had been discussed in a 
recent Validation Working Group meeting, which could be another place for 
discussion.

Tim said creation of a new WG depended on the members’ band width.  Wayne noted 
that creating a new WG doesn’t create more time for members, and most member 
are busy so the Validation WG might be a better place for discussion of CAA 
issues.  Kirk noted that Rick had created a list of open CAA issues from the 
last discussion, and asked if the VWG should start with that list; Rick said it 
was probably a good starting point.  Tim said he had additional items to add to 
Rick’s list, and agreed to be maintain a list of CAA issues for discussion in 
the VWG.

11.         Ballot Status - Discussion of ballots.  Kirk noted the members had 
worked through the backlog of pending ballots, and there were only a few draft 
ballots remaining on the Agenda.  Ryan said he had delayed introducing a ballot 
requiring CAs to write their CPSs in RFC 3647 format due to all the other 
activities happening, but thought the time to introduce the ballot was now 
right.  HARICA was one endorser and Trustwave had been the other, but Tim had 
now moved to DigiCert.  Tim again volunteered to be an endorser in his role at 
DigiCert.  Dimitris asked about the time frame for compliance by CAs in moving 
to RFC 3647 format.  Ryan planned to push out the deadline for RFC 3647 updates 
from February 2018 to April 2018, and would proceed with a ballot.  He also 
noted there was some minor inconsistency in the language of the BRs versus the 
EV Guidelines as to CPS format, which would be resolved by the ballot.

12.         Locations for 2019 F2F meetings.  Kirk noted that the Forum had 
received the following generous offers to host the Face-to-Face Forum meetings 
in 2018 and 2019:

2018: March - Herndon VA (Amazon), June – London (Comodo), Oct. – Shanghai 
(CFCA)
2019: March – Cupertino (tentative), June – Greece (HARICA) - tentative, Oct. – 
Guangzhou (GDCA)

This would continue the pattern from 2017 of having one meeting each year in 
North America, Europe, and Asia.  Before committing the Forum for meetings two 
years in advance, he wanted to let members review the tentative calendar and 
offer comments and opinions.  Tim thought the pattern and meeting locations was 
good.  There were no other comments, so the meeting schedule will be as listed, 
subject to confirmation by the hosts.

13.         Any Other Business.  There was no other business.

14.         Next call: Dec. 14 at 12:00 Noon Eastern Time


_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to