Ok, it’s now in my Minor-Cleanups branch:
https://github.com/timfromdigicert/documents/commit/e4907ae35a7f775f3af1cc7ba463c51a238c4163#diff-7f6d14a20e7f3beb696b45e1bf8196f2 It will make it into a BR ballot in a few months. Keep finding these and reporting them! -Tim From: Public [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of realsky(CHT) via Public Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 7:42 AM To: Barry Kilborn <[email protected]>; public <[email protected]>; questions <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [cabfpub] [cabfquest] Wrong reference in BRGs, chapter 8.4 Dear Rufus, Besides, In writing BR assessment, I found there is another wrong reference in the Section 1.6 of BR. The defitinon of "Qualified Auditor" is read as Qualified Auditor : A natural person or Legal Entity that meets the requirements of Section 8.3. It should be "Qualified Auditor : A natural person or Legal Entity that meets the requirements of Section 8.2." I think the wrong reference is from the conversion of BR V1.2.5 or earlier version to RFC 3647 verison of BR. (Version 1.3.0/ Version 1.2.5 :Qualified Auditor: A natural person or Legal Entity that meets the requirements of Section 8.3 (Auditor Qualifications).) . Please see attached file or https://cabforum.org/baseline-requirements-documents/ If you read EVGL, then the defition of Qualified Auditor is correct. Qualified Auditor: An independent public accounting firm that meets the auditing qualification requirements specified in Section 17.6 of these Guidelines. And you will see section 17.6 as 17.6. Auditor Qualification A Qualified Auditor (as defined in Section 8.2 of the Baseline Requirements) MUST perform the CA’s audit. If you propose these amendment, I will endorse the ballot. Sincerely Yours, Li-Chun Chen Deputy Senior Engineer CISSP, CISA, CISM, PMP Chunghwa Telecom Taiwan -----Original message----- From:Buschart, Rufus<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > To:[email protected]<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Cc:Barry Kilborn<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2018 19:05:01 Subject: [外部郵件] [cabfquest] Wrong reference in BRGs, chapter 8.4 Dear CA/B forum members! It appear there is a wrong reference in the BRGs, chapter 8.4 “Topics covered by assessment”. This chapter includes the statement “The audit MUST be conducted by a Qualified Auditor, as specified in Section 8.3.”. This should most probably read “as specified in Section 8.2” which describes “Identity/qualifications of assessor”. Section 8.3 is empty. I would propose, this should be changed in one of the upcoming ballots. I would post this directly to the mailing list, but as not being a member, I’m prohibited from posting. Best regards Rufus Siemens AG Information Technology Human Resources PKI / Trustcenter GS IT HR 7 4 Hugo-Junkers-Str. 9 90411 Nnberg, Deutschland Tel.: +49 1522 2894134 mailto:[email protected] www.siemens.com/ingenuityforlife <https://siemens.com/ingenuityforlife> Siemens Aktiengesellschaft: Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Jim Hagemann Snabe; Vorstand: Joe Kaeser, Vorsitzender; Roland Busch, Lisa Davis, Klaus Helmrich, Janina Kugel, Cedrik Neike, Michael Sen, Ralf P. Thomas; Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin und Mchen, Deutschland; Registergericht: Berlin Charlottenburg, HRB 12300, Mchen, HRB 6684; WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE 23691322 _______________________________________________ Questions mailing list [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/questions 本信件可能包含中華電信股份有限公司機密資訊,非指定之收件者,請勿蒐集、處理或利用本信件內容,並請銷毀此信件. 如為指定收件者,應確實保護郵件中本公司之營業機密及個人資料,不得任意傳佈或揭露,並應自行確認本郵件之附檔與超連結之安全性,以共同善盡資訊安全與個資保護責任. Please be advised that this email message (including any attachments) contains confidential information and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and all attachments from your system and do not further collect, process, or use them. Chunghwa Telecom and all its subsidiaries and associated companies shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this email nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. If you are the intended recipient, please protect the confidential and/or personal information contained in this email with due care. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Also, please self-inspect attachments and hyperlinks contained in this email to ensure the information security and to protect personal information.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
