On 9/2/2018 3:53 πμ, Kirk Hall wrote:
>
> Dimitris – I already DID  include the deadline in BR Sec. 1.2.2 for
> the copy that will go on the website – see attached, at numbered page
> 3 of the attached pdf.  I don’t believe the information in this table
> has ever been part of the underlying Ballot, has it?  I always thought
> it was included after the Ballot, and is a “non-substantive” part of
> the BRs meant to be helpful.  So I don’t think it has to be added to a
> cleanup ballot.
>

Good to know, thanks.

> On Wednesday (yesterday) I sent you, Ben, and Jos the “final” pdfs to
> go on our website showing the results of Ballots 217 and 218 – please
> upload those copies, and not any earlier copies.
>

I think Jos already uploaded those. We are also trying to update the
information on https://cabforum.org/ballots/.


Dimitris.

> *From:*Dimitris Zacharopoulos [mailto:ji...@it.auth.gr]
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 8, 2018 1:51 AM
> *To:* Kirk Hall <kirk.h...@entrustdatacard.com>; CA/Browser Forum
> Public Discussion List <public@cabforum.org>
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL]Re: [cabfpub] Review Notice – Ballot 218
>
>  
>
> Kirk,
>
> We forgot to include the deadline of August 1st 2018 in section 1.2.2
> (Relevant Dates) for the deprecation of methods #1 and #5. It is an
> uncontroversial change but unfortunately, as previously discussed, we
> don't have a process for "editorial" changes.
>
>
> Dimitris.
>
>
> On 7/2/2018 8:35 μμ, Kirk Hall via Public wrote:
>
>     *NOTICE OF REVIEW PERIOD – BALLOT 218*
>
>     * *
>
>     This Review Notice is sent pursuant to Section 4.1 of the
>     CA/Browser Forum’s Intellectual Property Rights Policy (v1.2). 
>     This Review Period is for Final Maintenance Guidelines (30 day
>     Review Period).  A complete draft of the Draft Guideline that is
>     the subject of this Review Notice is provided with this Notice.
>
>      
>
>     Date Review Notice Sent:                         February 7, 2018
>
>      
>
>     Ballot for Review:                                      Ballot 218
>     - Remove validation methods #1 and #5
>
>      
>
>     Draft Guideline Sent with Notice:              CA-Browser Forum BR
>     1.5.6
>
>      
>
>     Start of Review Period:                             February 7,
>     2018 at 22:00 UTC
>
>      
>
>     End of Review Period:                              March 9, 2018
>     at 22:00 UTC
>
>      
>
>      
>
>     * *
>
>      
>
>     *IPR Policy Section 4.1 - Review of Draft Specifications*.  Prior
>     to the approval of a CAB Forum Draft Guideline as a CAB Forum
>     Final Guideline or Final Maintenance Guideline there shall be a
>     review period during which Participants may exclude certain
>     Essential Claims from CAB Forum RF Licenses. The CAB Forum Chair
>     shall initiate the Review Period by distributing to each CAB Forum
>     Participant a notice of review period and a complete draft of the
>     Draft Guideline that is the subject of such notice (“Review
>     Notice”). Each Participant on behalf of itself and its Affiliates
>     shall have sixty (60) days following the date of the receipt of
>     such Review Notice (“Review Period”) to review such Draft
>     Guideline and consider any licensing obligations with respect to
>     any Essential Claims that may be encompassed by such Draft
>     Guideline. The approval of a CAB Forum Final Maintenance Guideline
>     shall follow the same process except that the Review Period shall
>     be thirty (30) days.
>
>     / /
>
>     *Section 4.2 - Excluding Patents and/or Patent Applications From
>     Royalty Free Licensing Obligations During Review Period.  *Except
>     for Essential Claims encompassed by a Participant’s Contributions
>     that are actually incorporated into a Final Guideline or Final
>     Maintenance Guideline approved in accordance with the CAB Forum
>     Guideline approval process, Participants may within the Review
>     Period exclude Essential Claims from the CAB Forum RF License. In
>     such case, Participant shall be permitted to either make an
>     election, (i) not to grant a license or (ii) to provide a license
>     with all of the requirements of Section 5.1 with the exception of
>     subsection 5.1 f.
>
>     *Bylaws Section 2.4 - Requirements for Draft Guideline Ballots ****
>
>     (e)  If a Draft Guideline Ballot passes the Initial Vote, the
>     Chair shall initiate, no later than the 3rd business day after the
>     announcement of the Initial Vote results, the Review Period of 30
>     or 60 days, as applicable and as described in Section 4.1 of the
>     IPR Policy.  The Chair will initiate the Review Period by sending
>     the Review Notice to both the Member Mail List and the Public Mail
>     List.  The Review Notice will clearly specify the open and close
>     dates and times (with time zone) of the Review Period.  If the
>     Chair does not initiate the Review Period within 5 business days
>     after the announcement of the Initial Vote results, the Vice Chair
>     may initiate the Review Period, using the same process as the
>     Chair would have been required to use.
>
>      
>
>     (f)  The Review Period will continue to the end of the 30- or
>     60-day period, as applicable, regardless of the number of
>     Exclusion Notices filed pursuant to the IPR Policy during such
>     period, if any.  No later than 3 business days after the
>     conclusion of the applicable Review Period, the Chair will
>     distribute any Exclusion Notices submitted in accordance with
>     Section 4.2 of the IPR Policy via the Public Mail List; provided,
>     however, that the Chair may distribute such Exclusion Notices
>     earlier.***
>
>     *
>     *
>
>     * *
>
>      
>
>      
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Public mailing list
>
>     Public@cabforum.org <mailto:Public@cabforum.org>
>
>     https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public@cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to