CFCA votes YES
CFCA
Zhang Yi
-----原始邮件-----
发件人:"Dimitris Zacharopoulos via Public" <[email protected]>
发送时间:2018-05-08 05:48:38 (星期二)
收件人: [email protected]
抄送:
主题: [cabfpub] Voting begins for Ballot 223 v2 - Update BR Section 8.4 for CA
audit criteria
The following motion has been proposed by Dimitris Zacharopoulos of HARICA and
endorsed by Moudrick M. Dadashov of SSC and Tim Hollebeek from Digicert.
Background:
Section 8.4 of the Baseline Requirements describes the audit criteria for CAs
that issue Publicly-Trusted SSL/TLS Certificates. This ballot attempts to
achieve two things:
Remove the old ETSI TS documents
Align the WebTrust and ETSI requirements
"WebTrust for Certification Authorities" is equivalent to "ETSI EN 319 401" and
"WebTrust Principles and Criteria for Certification Authorities – SSL Baseline
with Network Security" combined with "WebTrust for Certification Authorities"
is equivalent to "ETSI EN 319 411-1".
-- MOTION BEGINS --
Replace the first two numbered items in section 8.4 from:
WebTrust for Certification Authorities v2.0;
A national scheme that audits conformance to ETSI TS 102 042 / ETSI EN 319
411-1; or
to:
"WebTrust for CAs v2.0 or newer" AND "WebTrust for CAs SSL Baseline with
Network Security v2.2 or newer"; or
ETSI EN 319 411-1, which includes normative references to ETSI EN 319 401 (the
latest version of the referenced ETSI documents should be applied); or
-- MOTION ENDS --
The procedure for this ballot is as follows (exact start and end times may be
adjusted to comply with applicable Bylaws and IPR Agreement):
|
BALLOT 223 v2 Status: Update BR Section 8.4 for CA audit criteria
|
Start time (22:00 UTC)
|
End time (22:00 UTC)
|
|
Discussion (7+ days)
|
30 April 2018
|
7 May 2018
|
|
Vote for approval (7 days)
|
8 May 2018
|
15 May 2018
|
|
If vote approves ballot: Review Period (Chair to send Review Notice) (30 days)
If Exclusion Notice(s) filed, ballot approval is rescinded and PAG to be
created.
If no Exclusion Notices filed, ballot becomes effective at end of Review Period.
Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the Public
Mail List.
|
Upon filing of Review Notice by Chair
|
30 days after filing of Review Notice by Chair
|
From the Bylaws section 2.4(a): "If the Draft Guideline Ballot is proposing a
Final Maintenance Guideline, such ballot will include a redline or comparison
showing the set of changes from the Final Guideline section(s) intended to
become a Final Maintenance Guideline, and need not include a copy of the full
set of guidelines. Such redline or comparison shall be made against the Final
Guideline section(s) as they exist at the time a ballot is proposed, and need
not take into consideration other ballots that may be proposed subsequently,
except as provided in Section 2.4(j) below".
Votes must be cast by posting an on-list reply to this thread on the Public
list. A vote in favor of the motion must indicate a clear 'yes' in the
response. A vote against must indicate a clear 'no' in the response. A vote to
abstain must indicate a clear 'abstain' in the response. Unclear responses will
not be counted. The latest vote received from any representative of a voting
member before the close of the voting period will be counted. Voting members
are listed here: https://cabforum.org/members/
In order for the motion to be adopted, two thirds or more of the votes cast by
members in the CA category and greater than 50% of the votes cast by members in
the browser category must be in favor. Quorum is shown on CA/Browser Forum
wiki. Under the Bylaws section 2.3(g), at least the required quorum number must
participate in the ballot for the ballot to be valid, either by voting in
favor, voting against, or abstaining.
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
