SSC votes: "Yes".
Thanks,
M.D.
On 9/14/2018 9:50 PM, Tim Hollebeek via Public wrote:
As no additional typos or mistakes appear to have been found in the
proposed redline, Ballot FORUM-4 v2 is hereby withdrawn, and this new
Ballot FORUM-4 v3 submitted in its place. Apologies for not including
the latest ETSI fixes; I really wanted to include them, but I’m just
worried that discussion may not be over yet.
Ballot FORUM-4 v3: Fix mistakes made during passage of Governance
Reform Ballot 206
Purpose of Ballot
The Governance Reform ballot (Ballot 206 under the old ballot
numbering scheme) was extremely complicated and took roughly two years
to draft.
The changes to the Bylaws from Ballot 216 were intended to be included
in the Governance Reform ballot, but were accidentally not included.
The attached version of the Bylaws restores the important discussion
period changes that were approved by the members but then accidentally
overwritten.
The following motion has been proposed by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert
and endorsed by Wayne Thayer of Mozilla and Moudrick Dadashov of SSC.
--- MOTION BEGINS ---
This ballot replaces the “Bylaws of the CA/Browser Forum” version 1.9
with version 2.0 of those Bylaws, attached to this ballot.
--- MOTION ENDS ---
The procedure for approval of this ballot is as follows:
Discussion (7 days)
Start Time: 2018-09-14, 2:50 pm Eastern Time
End Time: 2018-09-21, 2:50 pm Eastern Time
Vote for approval (7 days)
Start Time: 2018-09-21, 2:50 pm Eastern Time
End Time: 2018-09-28, 2:50 pm Eastern Time
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
