On 2019-09-11 6:40 μ.μ., Ryan Sleevi via Public wrote:
I also feel a bit offended by your expression that I am "committed
to avoiding changes to the Bylaws". I would very much like to make
this a Bylaws update but I respect the majority's opinion not to
make small changes to Bylaws.
It's unclear why offense was received, but it was certainly not
intended. You made it clear in your earlier message that you believe
this should be in the Bylaws and you are intentionally not placing it
in the Bylaws. That seems a very clear, intentional choice, especially
in light of past discussion why it should be in the Bylaws, not do it.
I hope you understand that wanting to do one thing (propose this simple
change in the Bylaws) but not doing it because the majority asked for it
(as I explained, the majority doesn't like small changes to Bylaws
because it involves a lot of legal reviews, etc), doesn't mean that I am
"*committed *to avoid changes to the Bylaws". In any case, thanks for
clarifying that it was not intended.
You provided a very detailed response that captures the topic very well.
I will carefully review and consider how we can approach this in the
best way.
Dimitris.
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
Public@cabforum.org
https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
