On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 1:09 PM Kirk Hall via Public <public@cabforum.org> wrote:
> +1 Dimitris. As the immediate past Chair of the Forum and someone > involved in creating the Forum in 2005, your analysis below is correct. > As I mentioned, this is somewhat ahistorical. For example, this viewpoint you're sharing now does not seem consistent with your message in December 2005, proposing DigiCert (and all Sub-CAs) be excluded from participating in the Forum, and a discussion about the purpose of the Forum being about direct relationships with browsers. You can see this at https://cabforum.org/mailman/private/management/2005-December/000007.html , in the event you don't recall that discussion. It sparked a lot of lively discussion, such as the antitrust implications for the Forum ( https://cabforum.org/mailman/private/management/2006-March/000054.html ) and lengthy discussion about the membership criteria ( https://cabforum.org/mailman/private/management/2006-March/000040.html ). The minutes for that London meeting ( https://cabforum.org/mailman/private/management/2006-March/000078.html ) have further discussion about the participation model, as captured in https://cabforum.org/mailman/private/management/2006-April/000082.html
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list Public@cabforum.org https://cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
