I would potentially like to fix "Application Software Suppliers", and replace it with a better term, if others are interested. One possibility is to use Certificate Consumers, to more closely align with the Bylaws.
-Tim From: Public <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Dean Coclin via Public Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 3:06 PM To: CABforum1 <[email protected]> Subject: [cabfpub] Requirements language cleanup As mentioned on today's call, our team went through the CA/B Forum Baseline Requirements, EV Guidelines and Code Signing Guidelines to review for names which are being deprecated by the industry. The number found were very minor: In the EV Guidelines, the following text was found: "Denied Lists and Other Legal Black Lists" in Pg. iii Table of Contents 11.12.2 Black Lists; Pg. 30 11.12.2. Suggest changing to "Block Lists". In the EV Code Signing Guidelines, the following text was found: "In addition to checking revocation status, where practical, platforms should consult blacklists of suspect software". Suggest changing to "blocklist". This can be taken up by the code signing WG. In the TLS Baseline Requirements, there is reference to standard email addresses (page 19) used to contact parties for domain validation (i.e. webmaster, hostmaster, postmaster). However, I'm assuming these cannot be changed. I know there are some cleanup ballots either planned or underway and perhaps these can be included there. Dean Coclin DigiCert
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
