Dimitris: Could you explain why it's necessary to integrate? It seems much better to have Ballot -> Distinct BR version, and there's nothing in our IP policy I'm aware of that requires you to send them as a combined review.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 4:38 AM Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Servercert-wg <[email protected]> wrote: > > I just realized that ballot SC28 also contains changes to the BRs so I > will create a combined IPR review for ballots SC35 and SC28 later today. > > Thank you, > Dimitris. > > > On 2020-09-14 11:02 π.μ., Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) wrote: > > *NOTICE OF REVIEW PERIOD* > > > > This Review Notice is sent pursuant to Section 4.1 of the CA/Browser > Forum’s Intellectual Property Rights Policy (v1.3). This Review Period is > for two Final Maintenance Guidelines (30 day Review Period). Attached are > the complete Draft Guidelines subject of this Review Notice. > > > Ballots for Review: Ballot SC35 > <https://cabforum.org/2020/09/09/ballot-sc35-cleanups-and-clarifications/> > Start of Review Period: September 14, 2020 at 11:00 Eastern Time > End of Review Period: October 14, 2020 at 11:00 Eastern Time > > > > > Please forward a written notice to exclude Essential Claims to the Forum > and Working Group Chair by email to [email protected] and a copy to the > CA/B Forum public mailing list [email protected] before the end of the > Review Period. > > > See current version of CA/Browser Forum Intellectual Property Rights > Policy for details. > > > > *(Optional form of Exclusion Notice is available at > https://cabforum.org/wp-content/uploads/Template-for-Exclusion-Notice.pdf > <https://cabforum.org/wp-content/uploads/Template-for-Exclusion-Notice.pdf>)* > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Servercert-wg mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/servercert-wg >
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
