Did anyone else want to declare their membership in this new NetSec WG (by sending a declaration of intent to participate to the questions list)? I think we were planning on having the first meeting tomorrow, and we'll be sending out a new meeting invite.
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 8:18 AM Dean Coclin via Public <[email protected]> wrote: > Slight correction to the voting results: the number of CAs voting yes is > 22, not 23. The error was in the first bullet below. > > > > Dean Coclin > > > > *From:* Public <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Dean Coclin > via Public > *Sent:* Monday, December 27, 2021 6:13 PM > *To:* CABforum1 <[email protected]> > *Subject:* [cabfpub] Voting Results Announcement for FORUM-17 > > > > > > The voting on ballot FORUM-17 has completed, and the ballot has passed. > > > > Voting Results > > Certificate Issuers > > 22 votes total, with no abstentions: > > - 23 22 Yes votes: Buypass, Certum (Asseco), D-TRUST, DigiCert, Disig, > eMudhra, Entrust, E-TUGRA, GDCA, GlobalSign, GoDaddy, HARICA, JPRS, Let's > Encrypt/ISRG, MSC Trustgate, OISTE, SECOM, Sectigo, SSL.com, SwissSign, > Telia Company, SecureTrust, > - 0 No Votes > - 0 Abstentions > > NOTE: A vote placed by GlobalTrust was not received on the public list and > will not be counted. > > > > Certificate Consumers > > 2 votes total, with no abstentions: > > - 2 Yes votes: Google, Mozilla, > - 0 No votes > - 0 Abstentions > > > > Bylaw Requirements > > 1. Bylaw 2.3(f) requires: > > A "yes" vote by two-thirds of Certificate Issuer votes and by 50%-plus-one > of Certificate Consumer votes. Votes to abstain are not counted for this > purpose. > *This requirement was MET for Certificate Issuers and MET for Certificate > Consumers.* > > At least one Certificate Issuer and one Certificate Consumer Member must > vote in favor of a ballot for the ballot to be adopted. > *This requirement was MET.* > > 2. Bylaw 2.3(g) requires that a ballot result only be considered valid > when “more than half of the number of currently active Members has > participated”. Votes to abstain are counted in determining quorum. Half of > the currently active members at the start of voting was 14, so the quorum > was 15 for this ballot. > *This requirement was MET.* > > > ----- NEXT STEPS - INSTRUCTIONS FOR CA/BROWSER FORUM MEMBERS ----- > > Existing CA/Browser Forum members must declare their intent to participate > in the NetSec WG by email to [email protected], including a > statement of the Voting Class by which they qualify and the names/email > addresses of their designated representatives who will participate and who > will vote. We recommend that this be done by January 15, 2022. > > Once declarations of participation have been gathered, the NetSec WG’s > acting chair will convene a meeting tentatively scheduled for Tuesday, > January 18, 2022, at 2 PM EDT, the agenda for which will include: > - Adopting a list of initial members from the list of proposed, > qualifying applicants in conformance with the NetSec WG Charter > - Appointing a Chair, Vice Chair, and Webmaster for the NetSec WG > > - Discuss the WG’s first ballot – adoption of the Network and > Certificate System Security Requirements (NCSSRs) and the IPR review period > - Outline the goals and deliverables of the NetSec WG > > > > In the interim, the NCSSRs remain a valid guideline of the CA/Browser > Forum. Existing members of the working groups that have adopted the current > NCSSRs are bound by the IPR Policy’s Royalty-Free license. > _______________________________________________ > Public mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public >
_______________________________________________ Public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public
