Hi all,

Forwarding to the Forum public list to discuss at our call tomorrow.

DZ.

Jan 17, 2024 21:09:52 Bruce Morton <[email protected]>:


Hi Dimitris,

Should we discuss this on the CA/Browser Forum call tomorrow? It may be great 
for all to have input/feedback in case this happens again. Otherwise, we will 
discuss at the CSCWG call next week.

Perhaps Tim and Ian could confirm that they were endorsers and see if they have 
any issues with the error.


Thanks, Bruce.

*From:* Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) <[email protected]>
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 17, 2024 1:00 PM
*To:* Bruce Morton <[email protected]>; [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Cscwg-public] FW: Ballot CSC-22: High Risk 
Requirements Update

On 17/1/2024 7: 58 μ. μ. , Bruce Morton wrote: Yes, that is the email which 
started the discussion period. Do we need to start over? Dimitris. Bruce. From: 
Cscwg-public <cscwg-public-bounces@ cabforum. org> On Behalf Of Dimitris 
Zacharopoulos


On 17/1/2024 7:58 μ.μ., Bruce Morton wrote:
Yes, that is the email which started the discussion period.

Do we need to start over?

Dimitris.


 

Bruce.
 

*From:* Cscwg-public <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of 
*Dimitris Zacharopoulos (HARICA) via Cscwg-public
*Sent:* Wednesday, January 17, 2024 12:10 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: [Cscwg-public] FW: Ballot CSC-22: High Risk 
Requirements Update
 

Dean, Bruce, Apologies for not spotting this sooner. Can you please confirm if 
this is the email that was sent to the public list to start the discussion 
period? https: //lists. cabforum. 
org/pipermail/cscwg-public/2023-December/001141. html If
Dean, Bruce,

Apologies for not spotting this sooner. Can you please confirm if this is the 
email that was sent to the public list to start the discussion period?

https://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/cscwg-public/2023-December/001141.html[https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/cscwg-public/2023-December/001141.html__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!fSDk2HOLnm7WIn39bQFF9-yDtQjM_HQmeMzH0CWlB2U54D1EYMxay5UCeLFyDe9zbdbMWsSBCoW8X4fz5-57vaIzDGRk$]

If this is the only email that was sent to start the discussion period, I'm 
afraid it is not compliant with the Bylaws because when the official discussion 
period started, the ballot did not include two endorsers. Instead, it seems 
that it went straight to voting, per 
https://lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/cscwg-public/2024-January/001145.html[https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.cabforum.org/pipermail/cscwg-public/2024-January/001145.html__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!fSDk2HOLnm7WIn39bQFF9-yDtQjM_HQmeMzH0CWlB2U54D1EYMxay5UCeLFyDe9zbdbMWsSBCoW8X4fz5-57vQ0vidAH$].

Again, sorry for not discovering this earlier and I would definitely need 
another pair of eyes to confirm this.

Dimitris.

On 17/1/2024 6:36 μ.μ., Dean Coclin via Cscwg-public wrote:
Resending to the list…
 

*Dean Coclin*
 

 

*From:* Dean Coclin
*Sent:* Friday, January 12, 2024 4:26 PM
*Subject:* Ballot CSC-22: High Risk Requirements Update
 

Voting has concluded on Ballot CSC 22 and the results are as follows:
 

Certificate Issuers:
Yes: (7) Digicert, eMudra, Entrust, Globalsign, HARICA, Sectigo, Viking Cloud
No: (0)
Abstain: (0)
 

Certificate Consumers:
Yes: (1) Microsoft
No: (0)
Abstain: (0)
 

Quorum was achieved. Therefore the ballot passes.
 

 

*Dean Coclin*
CSCWG Chair
 

 

 

*From:* Cscwg-public <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Bruce 
Morton via Cscwg-public
*Sent:* Friday, January 5, 2024 3:02 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* [Cscwg-public] Voting Period begins - Ballot CSC-22: High Risk 
Requirements Update
 

*Purpose of the Ballot*
This ballot updates the “Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management 
of Publicly‐Trusted Code Signing Certificates“ version 3.4 in order to clarify 
language regarding Signing Service and signing requests. The main goals of this 
ballot are to:
1. Remove references to High Risk Certificate Request, since the CSBRs do not 
provide any actions for a high risk application.
2. Remove references to High Risk Region of Concern, since the CSBR appendix 
has never been populated.
3. Remove rules for a Takeover Attack to require the Subscriber to generate 
keys in a crypto device, since crypto device key generation is now a baseline 
requirement for all code signing certificates.
4. Remove option to transfer private key which has been generated in software.
5. Cleanup to remove Subscriber key generation option which expired effective 1 
June 2023.
6. Cleanup to remove “any other method” to verify the Subscriber key was 
generated in a crypto device, since this option expired 1 June 2023.
The following motion has been proposed by Bruce Morton of Entrust and endorsed 
by Tim Hollebeek of DigiCert and Ian McMillan of Microsoft.
 

*MOTION BEGINS*
 

This ballot updates the “Baseline Requirements for the Issuance and Management 
of Publicly‐Trusted Code Signing Certificates” ("Code Signing Baseline 
Requirements") based on version 3.4. MODIFY the Code Signing Baseline 
Requirements as specified in the following redline: 
https://github.com/cabforum/code-signing/compare/e0da5532ab81e35e2e92536c1bc9ea3c36765b26...50871dc08d39102daf6c93fa556a869790643fb6[https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/url.avanan.click/v2/___https:/urldefense.com/v3/__https:/github.com/cabforum/code-signing/compare/e0da5532ab81e35e2e92536c1bc9ea3c36765b26...50871dc08d39102daf6c93fa556a869790643fb6__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!eGQ4FLzNANTdAsLaGTDHePbCY7_W0AsXx1qTmmyTqiyaSVcoj5VGsgK7r7e1D0YQaI5U-YDAzAAi90kRle47DpUbNXxd$___.YXAzOmRpZ2ljZXJ0OmE6bzpkNzM2ZWY2OTUzNWVhMjY4M2JhMWY5ZDQ5ZmY0MjRkODo2OjNmNzk6OWNkNzk0NTVmM2U3NTY4NGE1NWE4MmI0M2ZjMmE1YzU0MGZiMDljODdiYzFhZTdhMDdhYTJiODZmZDM3OWQ5ZjpoOkY__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!fSDk2HOLnm7WIn39bQFF9-yDtQjM_HQmeMzH0CWlB2U54D1EYMxay5UCeLFyDe9zbdbMWsSBCoW8X4fz5-57vdp8Qrzd$]
 

*MOTION ENDS*
The procedure for this ballot is as follows: Discussion (minimum 7 days)
 

1. Start Time: 2023-12-15 00:00 UTC
2. End Time: 2024-01-05 20:00 UTC
 

Vote for approval (7 days)
 

3. Start Time: 2024-01-05 20:00 UTC
4. End Time: 2024-01-12 20:00 UTC
/Any email and files/attachments transmitted with it are intended solely for 
the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If this message 
has been sent to you in error, you must not copy, distribute or disclose of the 
information it contains. _Please notify Entrust immediately and delete the 
message from your system./_




_______________________________________________
Cscwg-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/cscwg-public[https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/cscwg-public__;!!FJ-Y8qCqXTj2!fSDk2HOLnm7WIn39bQFF9-yDtQjM_HQmeMzH0CWlB2U54D1EYMxay5UCeLFyDe9zbdbMWsSBCoW8X4fz5-57vXXfnulw$]
 



_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cabforum.org/mailman/listinfo/public

Reply via email to