I already ask Ben Wilson to change Andre´s email. Thank you. Em terça-feira, 13 de dezembro de 2022 às 16:09:04 UTC-3, [email protected] escreveu:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 11:59 AM Lucia Castelli <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Kurt, please, is possible to keep this conversations calm ? Sorry, but >> sometimes you do a lot of confusion with what is simple to understand. >> > > Your logical fallacy is: "Playing on Emotion". Please don't play these > games, keep it real and factual. > > I also work for SERPRO now and can speak for them. > > My proof is a non SERPRO email address, and the fact that I said I work > there. Which is the same as your proof. > > Do you see why this is a problem now? Please use your work email addresses > that are tightly associated with the CA applying (ideally the same domain). > I suspect we need to make this a requirement for CAs to communicate clearly > and provably instead of allowing throw-away Gmail addresses. > > Otherwise, we'll have random @gmail.com addresses joining the list and > claiming to be the CA and potentially causing problems. > > >> >> OK, Andre is not using SERPRO. GOV.BR, but he works with us, in our team. >> >> WE -> Means in this context - us from CA SERPRO SSL. >> >> Thank you >> >> >> Em terça-feira, 13 de dezembro de 2022 às 15:49:06 UTC-3, >> [email protected] escreveu: >> >>> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 11:23 AM André Silva <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> We use the RDAP protocol to query the domain contact as difined in the >>>> Baseline Requirements - section 1.6.1: >>>> >>>> >>> Sorry, who is "we" in this context? If you are speaking on behalf of >>> SERPRO why are you using an anonymous @gmail.com address? >>> I think it's critically important that if you are speaking for SERPRO, >>> that you are actually able to prove to some minimal degree that >>> you speak for SERPRO. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> [image: Screenshot 2022-12-13 114640.png] >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> *Domain Contact: The Domain Name Registrant, technical contact, or >>>> administrative contact (or the equivalent under a ccTLD) as listed in the >>>> WHOIS record of the Base Domain Name or in a DNS SOA record, or as >>>> obtained >>>> through direct contact with the Domain Name Registrar * >>>> >>>> >>>> Em terça-feira, 13 de dezembro de 2022 às 12:04:57 UTC-3, Andrew Ayer >>>> escreveu: >>>> >>>>> On Mon, 12 Dec 2022 12:00:22 -0800 (PST) >>>>> Lucia Castelli <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > This query aims to verify >>>>> > a) which organization is responsible for the domain with Registro.br >>>>> > or non-br; >>>>> > b) which person or which area of the organization is registered as >>>>> > responsible for the >>>>> > domain. We also use option 3.2.2.4.2 for domain validation. >>>>> >>>>> How do you determine the Domain Contact for domain validation method >>>>> 3.2.2.4.2? >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "public" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/a/ccadb.org/d/msgid/public/df80f7c8-a1e7-4d32-944f-57bcd108ea9dn%40ccadb.org >>>> >>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/ccadb.org/d/msgid/public/df80f7c8-a1e7-4d32-944f-57bcd108ea9dn%40ccadb.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Kurt Seifried (He/Him) >>> [email protected] >>> >> > > -- > Kurt Seifried (He/Him) > [email protected] > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "public" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/ccadb.org/d/msgid/public/02dcfaf0-2776-45eb-9bab-2f25798503c5n%40ccadb.org.
