Dear Ben,
Thank you for bringing up this topic. Concerning the sentence “*We have previously instructed CAs that when there is no CRL, they should put an empty JSON array in this field,* "[]" I have the following question (please excuse my ignorance): To which case does the above mentioned sentence refer to? 1. The CA does *not issue* a CRL *at all* (e.g. because it relies on OCSP only or because it issues short-lived certificates for which no revocation services are provided). 2. The CA issues a full CRL only, *no partitioned* CRLs are issued and therefore no array of partitioned CRLs is provided. Thanks in advance for your answer. Best regards Adrian Adrian M. Mueller Product Manager Certificate Services +41 43 811 05 97 [email protected] Ben Wilson schrieb am Freitag, 10. März 2023 um 20:22:27 UTC+1: > All, > The CCADB currently has a field titled, "JSON Array of Partitioned CRLs". > We have previously instructed CAs that when there is no CRL, they should > put an empty JSON array in this field, "[]". A problem has arisen when > this field is populated via API. When this notation for an empty array is > submitted to the CCADB via API, it is dropped. So, I'm wondering whether we > should adopt some other, consistent notation that will work with the API > and for everyone who might use the information from this field in the > CCADB. (I don't like the idea of just leaving this field empty, because > that is the default when no information has been provided by the CA.) > Any advice is appreciated. > Thanks, > Ben > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CCADB Public" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/ccadb.org/d/msgid/public/8bcf98c4-f8f8-4a35-a994-d83291d941e9n%40ccadb.org.
