I love you last statement, i need to moderate myself, yet, Bradley and others use the same explicit language on numerous times? Since when? Since when do I have to justify anything, when no one before me, and none now justifies anything.

Also, some of those things where in deed started when you where secretary, or did you forget as well... maybe you should now supply the documents. Also, the only thing I failed to do in my duty was the minutes, outside of that, Bradley opened the account, period, you did in deed state to me, wait for the check to come in and get with Bradley to determine what to do, I got with Bradley and he stated to send it back.. I never failed to do anything with the account.

As for the allegation of not doing any of my duties, it is my duty to not only protect the corporation, by the members that make it a corporation, and that does include not allow a members membership be removed due to statements he has or implied to state in any way... it is called freedom of speech, or press whichever you prefer. And since you want to go down this road, it is such an insult to anyone, who now can not express themselves except to bash Mr. Baptista, when in fact, John, Bradley, and you Karl have done the exact same things; and in public. Wow the pots calling the kettle black here... which means by the amended by-laws, I can motion to have all three of you removed.

John for calling Peter,  Joe's right hand man, without proof of allegations.
Bradley for twisting the threads around to suit his, yours, and Johns agenda. You for not performing your duties as secretary when you where in that role. hell, even Xennt could be motion to be removed, stating that I'm Joe's agent, John stated this as well... wait a tick, what about a life threaten statement, is that grounds for removal, I think so right.. do you understand where I'm going.. or are you just gonna read this, and say oh there he is on his rant again..

Yet I don't and that is the point, I don't want any member removed, Xennt, John, Joe, Karl, Bradley, and everyone else that is watching us, should understand we are for the TLD holders, and that's that, not yours, mine, or anyone else's personnel vendetta against anyone because you don't like them, I don't like John, doesn't mean I want to have him removed, and he has done a lot of things against me..

But I guess discussing things with you people is out of the question, you hold my words from phone conversation to be gold, maybe I should start publishing some of these phone conversations.

As for the strike, I'm doing nothing, on any committee , as agent, or secretary, until the Board has had time to review all actions of all executives in every position on every committee of the TLDA. Oh, but I guess I forgot to send in the email some month ago, since my request are dimissed, and ignored, I didn't think it important to inform anyone, much like what has been happing. Time for not only me, but everyone to own up to what they have or have not done, and I have included from the inception of the TLDA, way back when, since you all have decided to include the 2001, when it was in fact the TLDA.ORG site, which means John must answer for his deeds dealing with the name, yet again, but we already know what he is going to say (I'm not starting anything that you all haven't already published, that will ALWAYS be brought up.. like WHY was the official website name changed...

And "Just Because" isn't gonna cut it anymore.

You've mandated the explicit use of the web site to make nominations, and yet the by-laws which I followed, all be it, Peter didn't need an actual nomination, was done correctly. You can not make me do something that is not guide-lined. And this was pointed out by Bradley, does the by-laws state I have to use the web-site to make a nomination? If it does this is a change that was never voted on. And that my friends, or not, is fraud. Changing the constitution without proper channels being followed is the utmost serious infraction.

David

[email protected] wrote:
No David, he was referring almost exclusively to things since the election in which you became Secretary and self-assumed a number of authorities but performed none of your actual responsibilities. This is not about whether anyone wants you in or out, just whether or not you do your jobs, as you are not in any contested seat that I can remember for this election cycle, anyway. As for the strike, is that from all your TLDA duties or just from Secretarial duties? In any case, what difference should we notice between your normal behavior and you being on strike? You always attack as if from the outside as it is. How will your strike affect anything?

-Karl E. Peters

P.S. Please police your own language so no mopderation will be required!!!



Quoting David Scott <[email protected]>:

You are referring to things that where started before I was secretary.
Karl was the secretary at the time all this was started, but had my
formal request for documents been honored, you and ever other Board
member would know this.

You don't want me in, vote me out.
David

PS: I'm on strike until the request is honored, I have requested
formally multiple times. To many times to remember.




Change the rules as often as you want, you are committing an injustice
to the TLD holder of that TLD, and you _________ know it.

Bradley D. Thornton wrote:
Karl, I feel your frustration.

Pls see comments w/cites below...

[email protected] wrote:
We have a secretary. since when is it the CEO's job to do the minutes, too?

Since when did the secretary do anything? LOL!

Never did the corporate filings correctly, and as he was directed, requiring a correction and the money to be spent again. http://tldainc.org/pipermail/public_tldainc.org/2009-June/000236.html

Never turned in receipts for the corporate filings, for reimbursement, claiming his out of pocket expenses were double what they really were. http://tldainc.org/pipermail/members_tldainc.org/2009-June/001300.html

Never turned in any of the applications for membership he's been sitting on for months, until there was no point in doing so (That could be construed as deliberate sabotage too) http://tldainc.org/pipermail/members_tldainc.org/2009-June/001300.html

http://tldainc.org/pipermail/membership_tldainc.org/2009-July/000032.html

Never completed, let alone start, programming projects he offered to engage (database). http://tldainc.org/pipermail/members_tldainc.org/2009-June/001301.html

Never produced contracts as he said he would for resources he said were corporate infrastructure, then indian-gave them, citing non-use by the corporation as the reason for withdrawing those resources. http://tldainc.org/pipermail/board_tldainc.org/2009-April/000121.html

Never opened the bank account as he was supposed to. http://tldainc.org/pipermail/board_tldainc.org/2009-May/000211.html

Never voted on [BR 09-003], citing reasons of wanting to wait a couple of days until he opened the bank account before doing so. http://tldainc.org/pipermail/board_tldainc.org/2009-May/000217.html

Never returned the check made out to the company after he was replaced as the person to open the account, citing personal reasons for not being able to lick the stamp and drop it in a mailbox. This, after claiming it took 31 days for the check to travel across town as evidenced by the postmark when you sent it to him. http://tldainc.org/pipermail/board_tldainc.org/2009-June/000249.html and http://tldainc.org/pipermail/members_tldainc.org/2009-June/001320.html

Never submitted any of the minutes from any of the proceedings (His main job). http://tldainc.org/corporate-documents/57-minutes.html

He has solicited monies and personally accepted those unauthorized funds in the name of the corporation, instructing people to send these funds directly to him directly at his or that of other third party personal residences. http://tldainc.org/pipermail/public_tldainc.org/2009-June/000236.html

He's abetted the perpetuation of damages to the corporation by refusing to dutifully protect it from nefarious individuals with overtly destructive motives and agendas. http://tldainc.org/pipermail/board_tldainc.org/2009-June/000229.html

He's threatened individuals in the corporation (specifically, the founder http://tldainc.org/pipermail/members_tldainc.org/2009-June/001280.html ), and the corporation itself. http://tldainc.org/pipermail/members_tldainc.org/2009-June/001281.html

Something, almost anything constructive from David would be most welcomed. He's turned out to be much less than adequate in the position, and completely remiss in his responsibilities. I tire of his childish rants too, projecting his incompetence in performing the duties and responsibilities which he sought and accepted upon others who are working toward the advancement of our mission.


-Karl

Quoting "Bradley D. Thornton" <[email protected]>:

I was waiting for Karl to submit the minutes LOL! It happened almost a
month ago.

ZYZTM wrote:
Finally. What took you so long?
Below the hyperlink:
http://tldainc.org/corporate-documents/57-minutes/99-minutes-21-june-2009.html Regards,
Xennt
/-------Original Message-------/
/*From:*/ Bradley D. Thornton <mailto:[email protected]>
/*Date:*/ 7/6/2009 9:18:40 PM
/*To:*/ [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
/*Subject:*/ [Public] Permanent expulsion of Joe Baptista from TLDA...
The minutes concerning the permanent expulsion and removal of
professional troll and disruptor Joe Baptista from the TLDA membership
have been posted to the website. (http://TLDAinc.org)
Good riddance.
--
Bradley D. Thornton
Manager Network Services
NorthTech Computer
TEL: +1.949.544.1931
http://NorthTech.US
_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://tldainc.org/mailman/listinfo/public_tldainc.org



------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
http://tldainc.org/mailman/listinfo/public_tldainc.org


--
Bradley D. Thornton
Manager Network Services
NorthTech Computer
TEL: +1.949.544.1931
http://NorthTech.US


_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
http://tldainc.org/mailman/listinfo/public_tldainc.org




_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
http://tldainc.org/mailman/listinfo/public_tldainc.org





_______________________________________________
Board mailing list
[email protected]
http://tldainc.org/mailman/listinfo/board_tldainc.org




_______________________________________________
Board mailing list
[email protected]
http://tldainc.org/mailman/listinfo/board_tldainc.org



_______________________________________________
Public mailing list
[email protected]
http://tldainc.org/mailman/listinfo/public_tldainc.org

Reply via email to