Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698840 Jeff Fearn <jfe...@redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED Last Closed|2011-05-02 19:21:48 |2011-05-02 19:50:25 --- Comment #4 from Jeff Fearn <jfe...@redhat.com> 2011-05-02 19:50:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Jeff, > > This is not a feature request. This is a report of a defect. This same bug > occurred with FAQs and there could well be other areas where this crops up. > I'm > reopening. We don't fix issues with the display or use of unsupported tags. FAQs are supported, so the issue was fixed. Glossaries are not supported, therefore the issue will not be addressed. > As for the subject of glossaries in general, not every document is translated. > There could be dozens of products even outside Red Hat that could use > glossaries. Bug 475684 is still open because using glossaries is a valid > request. Microsoft uses glossaries for their product documentation, and we are > supposed to use their stylebook as a reference in our docs. We either support something fully or we don't support it at all. If people want to use unsupported tags then they need to fully support them themselves, which would involve making a brand and doing overriding the XSL. > If you don't want to support it *right now* then at least push this bug off > into some kind of future bucket, just so this defect doesn't get lost. Sure, deferred it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ publican-list mailing list publican-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican
