On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Jeff Fearn wrote: > For me this raises a larger issue, should Publican be interfering > with the source XML at all? > > XmlClean exists for two historical reasons, neither of which still > exist. Migrating old html/sgml content to XML, enforcing certain > standards are met.
Oh, interesting, I thought it was partly also related to the "standardization" required to generate strings for PO files. But if it's something different, then I support its removal. It's best to not interfer with the source XML when it's not required. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Pre-order a copy of the Debian Administrator's Handbook and help liberate it: http://debian-handbook.info/go/ulule-rh/ _______________________________________________ publican-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican
