Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663399 --- Comment #6 from Jared MORGAN <jmor...@redhat.com> 2012-05-04 00:25:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Section 3.7.1.1. Source RPM packages and binary RPM packages needs to be > reviewed. OS: Fedora 16 Publican Version: publican-3.0-0.fc16.t168.src.rpm Remarks: Doc used to verify is http://jfearn.fedorapeople.org/en-US/Publican/2.7/html-single/Users_Guide/index.html This section is now 3.8.1.1. Source RPM packages and binary RPM packages Information about the differences between source and binary RPMs now clearer, with explanatory sub-section 3.8.1.2. Desktop packages and web packages explaining the differences in more detail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ publican-list mailing list publican-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/publican-list Wiki: https://fedorahosted.org/publican
