Hey Dimi,

maybe silly question, but who are your targeted participants? People who
care, people who represent a group, people who want to do leg work, people
who like to think strategically? People who fulfill all four criteria
(read: you'll have a meeting with yourself)?

Thanks!

Lodewijk

On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 5:31 PM, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> The fall/winter policy agenda in Brussels has some exciting topics lined
> up for us. After the #saveFoP campaign, what will the Commission include in
> its reform proposal? Will some Member States like Belgium and Estonia get
> active on their own? What will happen to other copyright wish list items
> like safeguarding the public domain and re-use of public sector information?
>
> Non-copyright issues surfacing this season include a consultation on
> platform neutrality, privacy and data protection negotiations and a review
> of notice&action procedures.
>
> Organisational challenges for Wikimedia include learning how to smoothly
> shift gears between European and national actions. Plus, we should take a
> look at our long-term orientation in view of the public policy portal [3]
> to ensure global coherence.
>
> In brief, there's tons of interesting work awaiting us. After editions [1]
> and [2], let's pick the best date for this year's Big Fat Brussels Meeting:
> https://dudle.inf.tu-dresden.de/BFBM3/
>
> And yes, in case it wasn't clear, everyone's invited.
>
> Cheers,
> Dimi
>
>
> [1]
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/EU_policy/Big_Fat_Brussels_Meeting/minutes
> [2]
> https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/EU_policy/Big_Fat_Brussels_Meeting_Vol._2/minutes
> [3]https://policy.wikimedia.org/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Publicpolicy mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
>
>
_______________________________________________
Publicpolicy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy

Reply via email to