On 23 October 2015 at 17:01, James Salsman <[email protected]> wrote:
> It annoys me to see what could be a powerhouse for defending the community > from threats to the mission has apparently decided that a Twitter campaign > is the best they can do. I hope I am wrong, but where is the evidence that > more is being done? > You would like proof that the WMF publicpolicy/legal team is working on defending the privacy of its users (readers and volunteers) by proactively fighting the data-retention schemes of the US intelligence agencies? I suggest their most recent quarterly review documents, specifically this: https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Copy_of_WMF_Legal_Q1_2015-2016_Quarterly_review_slide_deck_(Public_Version).pdf&page=3 Or are you saying that suing the NSA isn't sufficiently proactive in this regard?
_______________________________________________ Publicpolicy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
