I am generally not in favour of such a proposal. However, it is not fully inconceivable to have a quota mandate for pages like youtube and highly frequented pages with suggestions to respect quotas. All I am saying is that technical feasibility is not the issue here :)
Secondly, (major and/or traditional) broadcasters are quick to highlight that it appears ideosyncratic to have the same broadcasting company with the same content under different mandates just because the method of transportation for the content changes from linear to nonlinear content with regards to questions such as advertisement breaks, Closed captioning requirements or language pluralism. MAthias On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Gervase Markham <[email protected]> wrote: > On 02/03/16 16:13, Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov wrote: >> *Audiovisual Media Services Directive * >> May 2016 >> Idea of applying national/minority programming quotas that exist for >> broadcasters and cinemas to online platforms. > > How does that make any sense whatsoever for a website which does not > have a broadcasting schedule? > > "Before we show you House Of Cards, please be advised that the EU > requires that you watch 7.3 minutes of amateur drama in Finnish." > > Gerv > > _______________________________________________ > Publicpolicy mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy _______________________________________________ Publicpolicy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
