It would surprise me, actually, if they thought about the copyright of the building and solved the problem in time, smoothly. I've talked to many officials in EU, states, municipalities, etc, and whenever they state something about copyright, it is usually just lorem ipsum, they have no idea what they are talking about. Any kind of explanation will have to start from the basics and it will take a lot of time. There are exceptions but they're truly rare, especially when it concerns FoP.
Raul On 4 Jun 2016 16:07, "Owen Blacker" <[email protected]> wrote: > Belgium doesn't have freedom of panorama, so certainly someone owns the > copyright. It wouldn't surprise me if the Commission did. > > On Sat, 4 Jun 2016, 12:34 Raul Veede, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The Estonian office of European Commission is trying to convince me the >> copyright of the Berlaymont building in Brussels belongs to the EC. While I >> think it might be possible that someone might have asked for the >> architect's permit to spread photos of the building, I have seen no proof >> of it. Can anyone prove or disprove that claim? >> >> Raul >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicpolicy mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy >> > > _______________________________________________ > Publicpolicy mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy > >
_______________________________________________ Publicpolicy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
