James – I'm interested in reading [1] but the PDF is behind a login screen, can I read this somewhere else (or do you have the full reference so I can search it)?
Thanks, Dario On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 9:43 PM, James Salsman <[email protected]> wrote: > Can anyone familiar with European Commission procedure please explain > how to support the Wikipedia-associated proposals in [1] based on the > statistics in [2] please? Very recent publications such as [3] in > Nature along with what appears to be a relatively sudden groundswell > of frankness and support e.g. [4] suggests to me that the time is > right to get out in front of these proposals. > > [1] https://www.researchgate.net/profile/David_Nicholas5/ > publication/275349828_Emerging_reputation_mechanisms_for_scholars/links/ > 553a22a60cf2c415bb06e6b7.pdf > > [2] http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~xshuai/papers/jcdl240-shuai.pdf > > [3] http://www.nature.com/news/fewer-numbers-better-science-1.20858 > > [4] http://blog.scielo.org/en/2016/10/14/is-it-possible-to- > normalize-citation-metrics/ > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l > -- *Dario Taraborelli *Head of Research, Wikimedia Foundation wikimediafoundation.org • nitens.org • @readermeter <http://twitter.com/readermeter>
_______________________________________________ Publicpolicy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
