I'm with Gerv on this. *I* endorse the idea, but the WMF should absolutely take no stance on the politics of any nation-state other than on specific topics.
If Trump says something stupid about one of our policy areas we should criticise him for it; if he says something sensible about one of them, we should welcome it. But the WMF totally shouldn't intervene in political campaigns in the more sense, even if the IRS code didn't forbid it. On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 at 15:50 Veni Markovski <[email protected]> wrote: > No. > > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 09:40 James Salsman <[email protected]> wrote: > > Should the Foundation endorse this effort? > > > http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/meet-the-hamilton-electors-hoping-for-an-electoral-college-revolt/508433/ > > _______________________________________________ > Publicpolicy mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy > > _______________________________________________ > Publicpolicy mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy >
_______________________________________________ Publicpolicy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
