Just to follow up, live stream here:

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/ep-live/en/committees/video?event=20180620-0900-COMMITTEE-JURI

Also a legend: Article 5 Compromise Amendment contains a baseline public
domain safeguard.

2018-06-20 7:32 GMT+02:00 Anna Mazgal <[email protected]>:

> Dear All,
>
> since we got hold of the voting list for the copyright vote, we prepared
> recommendations that I sent to over 20 MEPs in JURI that we hope will vote
> against the most damaging proposals (including article 13) and in favour of
> the good ideas on exceptions.
>
> We only give recommendations on articles: 3, 4, 5, 11, and 13 as well as
> the exceptions: Freedom of Panorama (CAs 56 and 57) as well as User
> extracts from pre-existing works and other subject matter in content
> uploaded or made available by users (Cas 58 and 59) - so called User
> Generated Content exception. For the remaining articles and corresponding
> amendments we provide no specific recommendation as to the vote. In
> summary, we present the following recommendations:
>
> On *article 3* we recommend voting against CA 4 (and corresponding CAs in
> recitals), instead we indicate specific amendments filed by members of JURI
> that in our opinion define text and data mining exception better.
>
> On *article 4* we recommend voting in favor of CA 6 (and corresponding
> CAs 23 to CA 26)
>
> On *article 5* we recommend voting in favor of CA 7 (and corresponding
> CAs 27 to CA 30)
>
> On *new exceptions (FoP, UGC)* we recommend voting in favor of CA 56 (and
> CA 57) as well as CA 58 (and CA 59)
>
> On *article 11* we recommend voting *against CA 12* (and corresponding
> CAs) and *in favor of** CA 12bis* (and corresponding CA 20bis and CA
> 41bis) that are the alternative Compromise Amendments
>
> On *article 13* we recommend voting *against CA 14* (and corresponding
> CAs) and *in favor of** CA 14bis* (and corresponding CA 47bis to CA
> 50bis) that are the alternative Compromise Amendments. In case CA 14 is
> adopted, we believe the negative consequence can be somehow mitigated by
> voting in favor of CA 2.
>
> Both IMCO 56 and AM 672 provide that the access gotten under one exception
> may not be used to exercise rights gotten under another exception - we find
> this approach harmful to the rights of users and legitimate uses of
> lawfully accessed content. We recommended voting *against **IMCO 56 and
> AM 672* as indicated in the document.
> Let’s hope that the vote will be at least partially along our line on the
> topic.
>
> Best wishes,
> Anna
>
> Anna Mazgal
> EU Policy Advisor
> Wikimedia
> [email protected]
> @a2na
> mobile: +32 487 222 945
> 51 Rue du Trône
> BE-1050 Brussels
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Publicpolicy mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
>
>
_______________________________________________
Publicpolicy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy

Reply via email to