Just to add that obviously as the UK chapter we have also been tracking the
progress of the Online Safety Bill and have responded to the various past
consultations as well as liaised with the WMF and allies such as Creative
Commons and Open Rights Group on key angles. Currently planning some joint
advocacy (with UK partners) around the dilution of the media literacy
aspects of the Bill. Happy to pick up on this again next week (it's late on
Friday night here!)

Best
Lucy

On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 at 12:35, <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Send Publicpolicy mailing list submissions to
>         [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit
>
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/publicpolicy.lists.wikimedia.org/
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Publicpolicy digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: EU Policy Monitoring Report: June 2022 (Rita Jonusaite)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 13:34:34 +0200
> From: Rita Jonusaite <[email protected]>
> Subject: [Publicpolicy] Re: EU Policy Monitoring Report: June 2022
> To: Publicpolicy Group for Wikimedia
>         <[email protected]>
> Cc: Kyle Taylor <[email protected]>, Matthew Gallagher
>         <[email protected]>
> Message-ID:
>         <CA+A7O8g-gvGgt9=dLUBLSb7CJ_tCVtGi+v5YRkb4=
> [email protected]>
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>         boundary="000000000000efbf3105e2bcc5e6"
>
> Hey all,
>
> If you have not seen re OSB in the UK, the Fair Vote UK is circulatring a
> Global letter to the UK Government on the loopholes in the UK's Online
> Safety Bill that they would like other organisations to sign. The joint
> letter is nearing 50 signatures already including Accountable Tech,
> Institute for Strategic Dialogue, Global Witness and Global Project Against
> Hate and Extremism etc. I am sharing with you their original message below
> and adding Matt and Kyle who are leading the campaign in Cc if you have any
> questions directly.
>
> *Deadline is COB Friday (but they can go as late as Monday
> to my understanding)!*
>
> Best,
>
> Rita
> *--ORIGINAL ASK--*
>
> I'm Matt of Fair Vote UK, and I'm leading within our organisation on an
> international coalition campaign to voice global opposition to the
> loopholes currently written into the UK's Online Safety Bill.
>
> *I'm writing to ask for your organisation's signature on a global letter
> <
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tyCCU9ms7AlMdieIl4zEGlBHf7n8snCttyQf4pBp8go/edit
> >*
>  *to the UK Government,* highlighting the danger posed by this bill's
> exemptions, exceptions and exclusions – which fundamentally undermine its
> purpose of making the internet safer. The risks are international in scope
> as these loopholes could effectively allow for harmful content and
> disinformation to be "laundered" in the UK. Please sign if possible!
>
> *Overview of the Letter: *
>
> The UK’s Online Safety Bill, currently making its way through Parliament,
> aims to make the UK “the safest place in the world to go online”.
> Unfortunately, it falls far short of that objective in its current form –
> to the extent that it could actually make adults and children *less safe *
> online*. *
>
>
> The bill contains glaring loopholes that could allow some of the actors
> most responsible for harm online to avoid oversight and regulation. Media
> entities are exempt based on incredibly lenient criteria which would allow
> nefarious actors to launder harmful content. The democratic importance
> exemption would let politicians' online speech stay up regardless of its
> vast reach and potential to cause harm. Paid ads are left in scope despite
> their demonstrable role in spreading disinformation and hate. All of this
> serves to create a two-tiered system  in which some of the most harmful
> actors are given precedence, prioritising their freedom of speech over the
> regular user. We’re demanding online regulation that protects all of our
> human rights *equally. *These loopholes have severe implications not just
> for the UK, but for the global community as well. If this new regime does
> not address them, the UK could become the world’s “disinformation
> laundromat”.
>
>
> *We’re urging orgs and individuals from anywhere in the world concerned
> with democracy, children’s safety, disinformation, public health, climate
> change or other related causes to sign this letter to the UK Government
> <
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tyCCU9ms7AlMdieIl4zEGlBHf7n8snCttyQf4pBp8go/edit
> >
> calling
> on them to close the loopholes and build a more robust human rights
> framework that applies equally. *In addition to this letter, we’re kicking
> off a public advocacy campaign on July 4th with significant digital spend
> behind it to further raise awareness about the OSB’s dangerous loopholes.
>
>
> *You can sign on by adding your name in the format shown at the bottom of
> the document. *
>
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns!
>
>
> Many thanks,
>
>
> Matt
>
>
> *P.S. Please feel free to forward this on to additional orgs and
> individuals you think would consider signing with [email protected]
> <[email protected]> cc'ed. Thank you! *
>
>
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2022 at 13:05, Eric Luth <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Thanks for the summary, Dimi. Interesting read on the Digital Commons,
> > happy to see that the Swedish government also supported.
> >
> > On Copyright reform, the Swedish government has sent its proposal on
> > copyright reform to the council on legislation, which is the last step
> > before it goes to parliament. We are currently analyzing the proposal,
> and
> > working with MPs to improve the worst parts and safeguard the best.
> >
> > Best
> > *Eric Luth*
> > Projektledare engagemang och påverkan | Project Manager, Involvement and
> > Advocacy
> > Wikimedia Sverige
> > [email protected]
> > +46 (0) 765 55 50 95
> >
> > Stöd fri kunskap, bli medlem i Wikimedia Sverige.
> > Läs mer på blimedlem.wikimedia.se
> >
> >
> > Den tors 30 juni 2022 kl 17:58 skrev Jan Gerlach <[email protected]
> >:
> >
> >> Many thanks for another great update, Dimi!
> >>
> >> Alex, the Foundation's Global Advocacy team is tracking the UK Online
> >> Safety Bill and we have published our first impressions on the text here
> >> <
> https://medium.com/wikimedia-policy/early-impressions-of-the-uk-online-safety-bill-72ae8b1aedbc
> >.
> >> We're in touch with various allies of our movement in the UK and plan to
> >> further engage on the bill when appropriate.
> >>
> >> Thanks for your interest!
> >> Jan
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 8:32 AM Alex Stinson <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Demi and list?
> >>>
> >>> Is anyone following the UK law at:
> >>>
> https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/online-safety-bill-supporting-documents/online-safety-bill-factsheet
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Curious if we are watching that in connection with other
> Disinfo/Content
> >>> moderation laws.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Alex
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 12:16 PM Dimi Dimitrov <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> The French government has vowed to invest money in the commons. Rub
> >>>> your eyes, read it again and then continue reading below.
> >>>>
> >>>> ====================
> >>>>
> >>>> DIGITAL COMMONS
> >>>>
> >>>> ====================
> >>>>
> >>>> It still surprises us to be able to put “French government” and
> >>>> “investment in the digital commons” together, but here we go: The
> French
> >>>> Presidency of the Council of the EU came up with a plan how the old
> >>>> continent can compete with dominant US tech companies. The plan is to
> have
> >>>> more “digital commons”, which can be anything open source, including
> >>>> software, code libraries, tools, repositories. The basic thinking is
> that
> >>>> if fundamental tools and libraries are accessible to all players,
> this will
> >>>> level the playing field. [1]
> >>>>
> >>>> —
> >>>>
> >>>> 19 EU Member Countries and the Commission presented the idea of
> digital
> >>>> commons at the Digital Assembly in Toulouse. They acknowledge that
> there
> >>>> are many instances of working digital commons, but also point out that
> >>>> oftentimes projects lack long-term, structural support. The plan
> envisages
> >>>> financial help and a “one-stop-shop” to find government support. [2]
> >>>>
> >>>> —
> >>>>
> >>>> Funds in the ballpark of tens of millions of euros are already
> pledged,
> >>>> but the concrete details are still in the making. Thanks to the
> leadership
> >>>> of Wikimédia France, our movement and a group of partners (Europeana,
> >>>> Communia, OpenStreetMap) are part of this conversation from the
> start. We
> >>>> especially want to show that governments can often help by removing
> legal
> >>>> and administrative obstacles, not just by peddling money. [3]
> >>>>
> >>>> ======
> >>>>
> >>>> CSAM
> >>>>
> >>>> ======
> >>>>
> >>>> We wrote about the proposal of the Commission to regulate the online
> >>>> moderation of “Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM)” in last month’s
> report
> >>>> [4]. While it is a very important issue to tackle, we do have great
> >>>> concerns with parts of the text, especially provisions that would
> allow
> >>>> scanning all online chats on a given platform. We are still analysing
> how
> >>>> exactly, if at all, this would impact Wikimedia projects. In the
> meantime,
> >>>> we can offer a short briefing. [5]
> >>>>
> >>>> —
> >>>>
> >>>> On the legislative side, the start feels very bumpy: The European
> >>>> Parliament probably won’t refer the file to a committee until
> September or
> >>>> October, while ample criticism is pouring in, including from the
> German
> >>>> government. [6]
> >>>>
> >>>> =========
> >>>>
> >>>> Net Neutrality
> >>>>
> >>>> =========
> >>>>
> >>>> The European Commission plans to push out a new legislative proposal
> >>>> after the summer that is expected to include provisions forcing some
> >>>> service providers to pay for data traffic (think Facebook and Netflix
> >>>> paying Deutsche Telekom and Telefonica). While this is a classic
> example of
> >>>> a lobbying battle between very large telecommunications companies and
> very
> >>>> large tech companies, it also would violate some basic principles of
> net
> >>>> neutrality. A group of civil society organisations, led by EDRi, sent
> a
> >>>> letter to the relevant Commissioners outlining the main issues. [7]
> >>>>
> >>>> —
> >>>>
> >>>> On the bright side, BEREC, the EU’s body of telecoms regulators, has
> >>>> updated its net neutrality guidelines to close some loopholes and
> >>>> effectively ban zero rating of data for some applications. [8]
> >>>>
> >>>> =============
> >>>>
> >>>> Disinformation
> >>>>
> >>>> =============
> >>>>
> >>>> The European Commission has presented an updated Code of Practice on
> >>>> Disinformation. [9] Wikimedia had not signed up the original Code,
> because
> >>>> we deemed it was mainly focused on “follow the money”, hence where
> >>>> disinformation is spread through advertising and paid reach. The
> version
> >>>> will allow researchers more access to data of large platforms and
> again
> >>>> focus on advertising.
> >>>>
> >>>> —
> >>>>
> >>>> The Code of Practice is a voluntary initiative for online platforms,
> >>>> but taking part in it essentially removes some obligations under the
> newly
> >>>> created Digital Services Act.
> >>>>
> >>>> =============
> >>>>
> >>>> Italian Dramas
> >>>>
> >>>> =============
> >>>>
> >>>> The Italian government published new draft guidelines about public
> data
> >>>> (open government) and opened a consultation. [10] They basically
> state that
> >>>> open government and open data provisions don’t apply to institutions
> >>>> related to culture, which is a very Italian thing. We wonder if this
> is in
> >>>> line with the Public Sector Information Directive and will
> investigate with
> >>>> Wikimedia Italia, which are also participating in the consultation.
> >>>>
> >>>> —
> >>>>
> >>>> The Italian government has been on a roll. It also published the draft
> >>>> national digitisation plan. It would establish an administrative fee
> for
> >>>> the commercial use of all public domain digitisations of cultural
> >>>> institutions. It essentially outlaws CC0 as a relevant license for
> most
> >>>> GLAMs in the country and circumvents the public domain safeguard
> enshrined
> >>>> in the latest copyright directive. There was a public consultation
> until 15
> >>>> June which Wikimedia Italy and partners participated in. Expect blog
> posts
> >>>> on Diff and on wikimedia.brussels soon.
> >>>>
> >>>> =============
> >>>>
> >>>> Polish & Czech Copyright Reforms
> >>>>
> >>>> =============
> >>>>
> >>>> The Czech copyright reform is in parliament. We have a Czech language
> >>>> copy. [11] The Polish government published its proposal, which will
> go to
> >>>> parliament very soon. We have a rough English translation. [12] If you
> >>>> consider yourself a copyright geek, enjoy reading them. If you want
> to help
> >>>> our national partners advocating on this, get in touch! :)
> >>>>
> >>>> ====
> >>>>
> >>>> END
> >>>>
> >>>> ====
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]https://twitter.com/AmbNum/status/1540657835427741699
> >>>>
> >>>> [2]
> >>>>
> https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/fr/politique-etrangere-de-la-france/diplomatie-numerique/actualites-et-evenements/article/le-rapport-sur-les-communs-numeriques-un-levier-essentiel-pour-la-souverainete
> >>>>
> >>>> [3]
> >>>>
> https://www.wikimedia.fr/pour-un-developpement-des-communs-numeriques-a-lechelle-europeenne/
> >>>>
> >>>> [4]
> >>>>
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]/thread/D6C5TA6FWDLA6JHLJHAT66C2BZ4AQ3XG/
> >>>>
> >>>> [5]
> >>>>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dD5AF8-uk2LFG7mu62AK7S80H4CrF1ftV7lheE6ZJBM/edit?usp=sharing
> >>>>
> >>>> [6]
> >>>>
> https://www.techdirt.com/2022/06/27/germany-says-hell-no-to-eu-proposal-to-outlaw-encryption/
> >>>>
> >>>> [7]
> >>>>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/16Q4d13xqr5UsPkoSMw7d_3YL-hZnq4cL/view?usp=sharing
> >>>>
> >>>> [8]https://fossbytes.com/europe-bans-zero-rating-internet-offers/
> >>>>
> >>>> [9]https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_22_3664
> >>>>
> >>>> [10]
> >>>>
> https://www.agid.gov.it/it/agenzia/stampa-e-comunicazione/notizie/2022/06/16/open-data-consultazione-linee-guida
> >>>> .
> >>>>
> >>>> [11]
> >>>>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1J7dvl4yEk6ScWIIypdI6Uq_7273T7G5i/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=110641574264354613563&rtpof=true&sd=true
> >>>>
> >>>> [12]
> >>>>
> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1N0ArQkgpZkQQcdpsidS_Yc-bS5liQsl5/view?usp=sharing
> >>>>
> >>>> Wikimedia Belgium vzw
> >>>> BE 0563.775.480 - RPR Brussel
> >>>> Antwerpselaan 40 Boulevard d’Anvers 1000 Brussel/Bruxelles
> >>>> www.wikimedia.be
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Publicpolicy mailing list -- [email protected]
> >>>> To unsubscribe send an email to
> [email protected]
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Alex Stinson
> >>> Lead Program Strategist
> >>> Wikimedia Foundation
> >>> Twitter: @sadads
> >>>
> >>> Learn more about how the communities behind Wikipedia, Wikidata and
> >>> other Wikimedia projects create calls to action to invite new
> contributors
> >>> through campaigns: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Campaigns
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Publicpolicy mailing list -- [email protected]
> >>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Publicpolicy mailing list -- [email protected]
> >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Publicpolicy mailing list -- [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> >
>
>
> --
>
>
> *Rita Jonusaite**Advocacy Coordinator *| EU DisinfoLab
>
> +32 488 59 70 70  (WhatsApp/Signal)
>
> Subscribe here to our newsletter <http://eepurl.com/dMT1Lg>
>
> EU DisinfoLab 2022 Conference (Oct. 25-26): Register now!
> <https://www.disinfo.eu/conference/>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A message part incompatible with plain text digests has been removed ...
> Name: not available
> Type: text/html
> Size: 42781 bytes
> Desc: not available
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Publicpolicy mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of Publicpolicy Digest, Vol 119, Issue 1
> ********************************************
>


-- 
Lucy Crompton-Reid (she/her)
Chief Executive
_______________________________________________
Publicpolicy mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to