Dear all,

Some of you may be following the developments of the UK Online Safety Bill, 
others may have heard of it a year ago and ignored it since. Wherever you fall 
on the spectrum, you may be interested in a new blog post titled "Good 
intentions, bad effects: Wikimedia projects and the UK’s draft Online Safety 
Bill." [1]

In this piece, Lucy Crompton-Reid, Chief Executive of Wikimedia UK, and Phil 
Bradley-Schmieg, Lead Counsel at the Wikimedia Foundation, detail how elements 
of the bill may require significant changes to how Wikipedia and other 
Wikimedia projects operate. Particular attention is given to the proposed 
“under-18 exclusion” rule since it has been the subject of a number of UK 
headlines. 

If you are interested in the actions that Wikimedia UK and the Foundation have 
taken related to the OSB, I recommend that you read Lucy's e-mail to the 
Wikimedia UK mailing list from April 23, 2023 [2]. I have copied her message 
below the line and links of this email. You can learn more about the UK OSB by 
reading our 'deep dive' from November 2022 [3] or 'early impressions' post from 
March 2022 [4]. 

Phil and Lucy are both members of this mailing list. Your feedback is welcome; 
we're always keen to learn from others on this mailing list, answer questions, 
and to discuss how best to protect the free knowledge movement in the midst of 
national legislative developments.

Enjoy the read!

Ziski
- - - 
[1] 
https://diff.wikimedia.org/2023/05/11/good-intentions-bad-effects-wikimedia-projects-and-the-uks-draft-online-safety-bill/
[2] 
https://lists.wikimedia.org/postorius/lists/wikimediauk-l.lists.wikimedia.org/
[3] 
https://medium.com/wikimedia-policy/deep-dive-the-united-kingdoms-online-safety-bill-b7020723dd39
[4] 
https://medium.com/wikimedia-policy/early-impressions-of-the-uk-online-safety-bill-72ae8b1aedbc
_________________________________________________

Lucy Crompton-Reid via lists.wikimedia.org 
Apr 23, 2023, 10:24 AM
to UK

Dear all

As I know many of you will be aware, the long heralded Online Safety Bill is 
now making its way through Parliament and is currently at the Committee stage 
in the House of Lords. The Bill will establish a new regulatory framework for 
online services, with Ofcom becoming the regulator. As it currently stands, the 
requirements of the Bill in terms of content moderation, age gating and user 
verification are incompatible with Wikipedia’s model, and the Wikimedia 
Foundation has stated that they will not be age gating the platform.

Wikimedia UK has been highlighting concerns about the proposed new legislation 
since the Online Harms White Paper, published four years ago. We have responded 
to various consultations, run by Ofcom as well as the government, and met with 
staff from both. One of the key issues highlighted by Wikimedia UK and the 
Wikimedia Foundation - as well as many organisations in the civil society 
sector - was the requirement to remove content that was “legal but harmful”. 
This was fortunately dropped from the Bill as it moved through the House of 
Commons at the end of last year. However, there remains much cause for concern. 

Working closely with the Wikimedia Foundation, I have been in touch with a 
number of peers (members of the House of Lords) over the past few months to 
highlight the unintended consequences of the proposed legislation on Wikimedia, 
and to advocate for changes to the Bill to protect our movement and safeguard 
open knowledge. The Lord Moylan has tabled a series of amendments on our behalf 
which address some of these issues, including a proposed exemption for small, 
community moderated and/or public benefit websites that are currently within 
the scope of the Bill. It’s likely that these amendments will be debated in the 
House of Lords on Tuesday or Thursday next week. Today, I will be sending a 
written briefing (attached for your information) urging support for these 
amendments to a target list of peers, and Jimmy will be giving an in person 
briefing at Parliament on Monday. 

We are envisaging further advocacy activities before and during the Report 
Stage in the House of Lords, which is when amendments that have made it to that 
point will be voted on. If you are interested in supporting these advocacy 
efforts, please let me know. 

All best

Lucy
_______________________________________________
Publicpolicy mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to