> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:20:37 +0200
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PubSub] missing items
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:36 PM, Nathan Fritz<[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Fabio,
> >
> > I would suggest that an <item-not-found /> error is appropriate. That seems
> > a logical response, would be logical in the code, and would be logical to
> > handle based on similar requests. PSA could add that to the list of
> > possible reasons for error in that section.
>
> Thanks for the answer. But what happens when requesting multiple
> items, if just some are missing? I wouldn't like to answer with an
> error stanza, forcing the client to repeat the request with just the
> available ids
>
> --
> Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
> Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
> jabber id: [email protected]
I think the behaviour should be to return the items which are there
with no error. This would be consistent with asking for last N items
and they don't exist as this does not produce an error code either.
_________________________________________________________________
More storage. Better anti-spam and antivirus protection. Hotmail makes it
simple.
http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9671357
