On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 4/23/09 11:06 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> > Currently, the <default/> element (used to retrieve the default
> > configuration options for any node at a service) is qualified by the
> > 'http://jabber.org/protocol/pubsub#owner' namespace but does not include
> > a 'node' attribute. In the jdev room just now, ermine pointed out that
> > this is inconsistent with the other uses of #owner, which all require
> > inclusion of a 'node' attribute (because the service will check to make
> > sure that the sending JID has permissions to act as an owner for that
>
> > node). She suggested moving <default/> so that its XMLNS is the plain
> > 'http://jabber.org/protocol/pubsub' namespace. I expressed concern that
> > this is backwards-incompatible. Therefore I'd like to know which pubsub
> > implementations (if any) currently support <default/>; if there are none
> > then this is a safe change.
> >
> > The chatroom discussion is here:
> >
> > http://logs.jabber.org/[email protected]/2009-04-23.html#11:12:40
>
> I never saw any enthusiasm for changing this. If you care, please speak up.
>

I don't see a reason why a namespace needs to be internally consistent
for element attributes.

Reply via email to