-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Old thread alert!

On 7/2/09 10:40 AM, Bob Wyman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Ralph Meijer <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> If we are going to remove batch publishing,
>> do we also remove batch notification?
> 
> Why would you remove batch notification? In a PubSub system, there is no
> necessary one-to-one correlation between events coming into the broker
> and the events leaving the broker. In some systems (particularly those
> that implement complex matching such as content-based matching), I may
> accumulate messages published into the broker for some period of time
> and then periodically evaluate collections of messages to determine what
> notifications to send and to whom they should be sent. Given that the
> evaluation involves multiple messages, it is entirely likely that I'll
> need to publish multiple items or notifications to a single end-point.

Agreed. I say remove batch publishing, but not batch notifications.

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkrCkIgACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxLWQCfS+dDniL7MvfaVan+hIVjdr0S
r1kAoJZx7t4fdgJbAbOiIZt1zn6AMDP2
=POjl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to