-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/28/09 11:32 AM, Tuomas Koski wrote: > Hi, > > 2009/10/28 Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 10/28/09 9:58 AM, Kirk Bateman wrote: >>> Time to wade in with my comment :) >>> >>> Tuomas's point about specifically requesting new posts on login rather >>> than expecting the node to start throwing back the missed posts while we >>> were offline is actually useful, it means that you can delay the >>> possible flood of posts. So for example if a user is subscribed to 20 >>> nodes in the manner described when he logs in he can get the latest >>> posts in a "controlled" manner (thus avoiding the normal presence style >>> flood on login). At least thats my thoughts on what he said. > > This is what I tried to explain. It seems my writing skills needs to evolve > :-D > > > 2009/10/28 Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]>: >> Yes, those are really two different models. The idea behind >> presence-based delivery is that it is similar to presence itself -- I >> don't need to specifically request presence from each of my buddies, >> instead when I log in I start receiving interesting information. The >> extended presence model used in PEP (which is the basis for all of the >> presence-based delivery stuff) follows a similar model. For more >> structured interactions, the model you suggest makes more sense. > > Yes. I will have the need for these both models: When the client is > online, it will receive messages "real time" > (presence_based_delivery), BUT the client must be also able (when > needed) to fetch items from the node that were published when the > client was offline. Because of this use case, I need to send the > "<items> IQ-query" stanza as I described earlier. > > Does it make more sense now?
Yes, it does. I'll look at this more closely during my next round of edits, which needs to happen by the end of next week because then I travel to Japan for IETF 76. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkrorCUACgkQNL8k5A2w/vxAZgCgux74+/3sErkJNoGlM3tWC24T miwAoPrww08cecwJwQDrvCJrYv9MT+zd =LOix -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
