Liam,

You need a client really, the you join that address as a groupchats or muc. I don't think googletalk client supports it.

Depending on your platform of choice grab psi or pidgin or adium that should sort you out, you can setup the client to use your gmail account.

Cheers

Kirk


On 2 Feb 2010, at 21:15, Liam <[email protected]> wrote:

OK, well gmail? I tried adding the addr as a friend, but didn't work...

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Liam <[email protected]> wrote:
>[email protected]

Hmm, reachable via meebo? Lame, I know... I don't have a native XMPP client. I'm only into XMPP for it's MQ resemblance :-)



On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Liam <[email protected]> wrote: > coming online and going offline quite frequently, so they are not always receiving notifications

Well even if not hopping on/off, I don't want them to miss messages, and it's easy to do that with a browser-based client.

> Have you looked at XEP-0184?

I've glanced at Stream Mgmt and AMP. I'm pretty interested in solutions that are implemented, since my first priority is to ship an app! Pubsub is implemented, so if it got a reliable delivery feature, there's a decent chance it'd reach code. So I'm here to lobby for that :-)



On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Liam <[email protected]> wrote: I didn't top-post, I replied to my original note. I'm only subscribed to digests.

IQ notifications are spec'd to only work for present subscribers, which doesn't help me. It'd be great if they would work for offline subscribers.

As for getting involved, how else would I begin to do that but by asking questions? Besides, I just suggested the outlines of a solution. (Which might well be redundant with written XEPs.)



On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Liam <[email protected]> wrote: Seems to me that a reliability extension can be quite simple... It needs an ack mechanism, and a configurable retry/fail policy on the server. It's sorta surprising the core protocols lack this, IMO...



On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Liam <[email protected]> wrote:
This blog post cogently positions XMPP against MQ systems
  https://stpeter.im/index.php/2007/12/07/amqp-and-xmpp/

But now two years later, the pubsub spec makes no mention of reliable delivery to offline subscribers, and even ejabberd doesn't implement AMP, which could provide that. (Code's written, but integration appears to have been deferred indefinitely.)

It is astonishingly easy to miss messages with a browser-based client. Um, have I chosen the wrong messaging technology for my app?






Reply via email to