Guess so, yeah. It'd be nice to not get these kinds of small updates, but I can't think of any even remotely good way for that to work. XD The hub can't just ignore extensions, obviously, and any kind of filtering that I can think of would add way more complexity than it's worth.
Also, CCing back to the list since it's not initially obvious why it happens. --Ravi Brett Slatkin wrote: > There ya go. So these aren't actually duplicates! You're getting > up-to-date information about the threading extensions. > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Ravi Pinjala <[email protected]> wrote: > >> May have found it! >> >> Looking at my logs again, I went through a few of the duplicated entries >> more carefully and found this: >> >> <thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0";>5</thr:total> >> <thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0";>9</thr:total> >> >> It seems that each of the feeds I get duplicated updates for includes a >> count of the comments on the entry, which also explains why I don't get >> duplicates for rarely-updated feeds - they're also rarely commented-on. >> >> --Ravi >> >>
