An issue arises if a standard mechanism is used to provide spam feedback. Such a mechanism will become a potential target of discovery in legal proceedings...
On Oct 19, 2009 7:46 PM, "Ian Kallen" <[email protected]> wrote: That's not a systemic problem, that's a terms-of-service problem. If I were operating a hub, I wouldn't re-publish the feedback nor offer any guarantee that an item is distributed to subscribers. If the subscribers I serve decided a site is a feed-scraper/affiliate/pills/pr0n site they don't like, that's between us. I'm not a proponent of YAGNI complexity. I'm assuming folks are interested in directing creative energies outside of spam filtering, PSHB should be informed by the failings of XMLRPC pings, SMTP and the other spam-infected data streams we've all experienced with protocols of days gone by that were too "simple" to account for these issues. It'd be a damn shame if hubs later end up having to bolt on awkward afterthoughts (SPF, sender ID, etc), that's why I'm raising it now. Bob Wyman wrote: > > > > A major problem with "feedback" is that folk may be offended when > their data is flagged as spa... > > >> On Oct 19, 2009 6:31 PM, "Ian Kallen" <[email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: >> ... > -- Ian Kallen blog: http://www.arachna.com/roller/spidaman tweetz: http://twitter.com/spidaman vox: 925...
