cool, sounds good - I'm trying it now. I'll try to better clarify both
publisher and subscriber parameters that I'm using.
Thanks again
Blaine Cook wrote:
On 1 February 2010 20:14, Michael Barinek <[email protected]> wrote:
I tend to agreed with Bob as well. Again, I just wanted to open the
conversation and receive feedback. In the basic application I put together I
included a 'hub.precision' or radius parameter. The thought was "please push
me nearby data" - not necessarily I want all the data within Boulder, CO (ie
the subscription does not include the boulder polygon).
As far as the "please push me data about nearby pizza places that tom jones
blogged about" - I've been there before ;) - and yes that is a different
filtering problem.
Thanks again for the feedback
I'd encourage you to drop the "hub." prefix - one of the really good
things about PSHB is that it's not push-only. The premise is that
there's always a feed to which you can subscribe or fetch to get a
"current state" of all [recent] items in a feed. This simplifies
*many* problems that face pure [push] messaging protocols.
Since PSHB is really just publishing notifications about a feed, the
parameters associated with the feed are not PSHB-specific, but rather
feed-specific.
b.
