It's really not recommended to reuse callback URIs. The way I'm doing it here 
is just having the callback be unique per feed ID, with the ID encoded within 
the callback URI. If using PuSH 0.3 this is made even simpler by being able to 
pass along arbitrary query string data within the callback that Hubs must 
maintain unchanged, so besides some complicated encoding scheme (used pre-0.2), 
you can just URL encode the feed ID and pass it around as its own parameter.

Paddy

 Pádraic Brady

http://blog.astrumfutura.com
http://www.survivethedeepend.com
OpenID Europe Foundation Irish Representative





________________________________
From: Waleed Abdulla <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wed, March 17, 2010 12:35:32 AM
Subject: Re: [pubsubhubbub] Verifying the true source of an entry


    In non-aggregated content delivery, there's actually nothing
>    presented by the hub which can fully identify the feed.  (This has
>    been something that always bothered me about using the same callback
>    for multiple feeds.)  
>

+ 1. There might be a reason for not sending feed and hub identifying 
information with the update but it's not clear to me. I hope this changes in a 
future update. Since every subscriber has to do that anyway, we might as well 
standardize it in the specs. 

Waleed
NetworkedBlogs

Reply via email to