On Monica Keller's wishlist are: > DELETE for asking that the resource gets deleted
"DELETE" semantics for Atom Entries (i.e. "deleted-entry") are now being defined as an extension to the base Atom RFC in an Internet Draft by James Snell which is currently being discussed on the AtomFormat WG list. Your input will be welcomed. See: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-snell-atompub-tombstones-08.txt and later versions as it evolves. I am aware of no definition of "delete" semantics for the legacy RSS format. > PUT for replacing a resource Replace ("PUT") semantics are clearly defined for Atom entries. In order to "replace" a previously published entry, you simply publish a new entry that has the same atom:id as the entry you wish to replace. "Replace" semantics are not clearly defined for the legacy RSS format. If you want "replace" semantics, don't use the legacy RSS format. bob wyman On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Monica Keller <[email protected]>wrote: > Guys I just posted a proposal for a new revision to the PubSubHubbub > spec which includes looking beyond Atom, synchronization and > authorization. > > Let me know what you think > http://code.google.com/p/pubsubhubbub/wiki/Pshb_OAuth2 > > > > On May 12, 5:04 am, Pádraic Brady <[email protected]> wrote: > > Great! Though now I have to update lots of code ;). Good to see it's > > not dead. > > > > Paddy > > > > On 12 May 2010, at 07:22, James Holderness <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > FYI, James S just published a new version of the Tombstones draft. > > > > >http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-snell-atompub-tombstones-07.txt >
