Excellent!  We like arbitrary formats...

On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Monica Keller <[email protected]> wrote:
> Cool !
>  Bret and I met on Friday and agreed on the minimal changes needed to
> support arbitrary formats in PubSubHubbub
>
>  I will post what we discussed on the wiki in detail but its pretty
> straightforward just using HTTP Headers
>
> Web Linking for hub and topic url and Date header for update date.
>
> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Matthew Terenzio <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Very cool. I didn't read it word for word yet, but I like the direction.
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Martin Atkins <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Today I wrote up a first draft for a variation on PubSubHubbub for
>>> JSON-based applications:
>>>
>>>    http://martin.atkins.me.uk/specs/pubsubhubbub-json
>>>
>>> As noted in the specification document, the goal is to make the hub as
>>> dumb as possible, having the payloads just be opaque JSON objects as far as
>>> the hub is concerned. This means that this can be used for multiple
>>> JSON-based applications without changing the hub.
>>>
>>> The near-term goal is to allow the fledgling "Activity Streams API" spec
>>> to use this as a transport, but I also want to make it useful for delivering
>>> other content and for proprietary payloads like those used in Facebook's
>>> real-time notifications API.
>>>
>>> It'd be nice if this format could be supported alongside Atom and RSS in
>>> the App Engine hub reference implementation, though I've not yet dug deeply
>>> into the code to figure out how hard that might be.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to