On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Alexis Richardson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Brett Slatkin <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Alexis Richardson >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Bob Wyman <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Now that we've got substantial experience with topic-based PubSubHubbub, >>> >>> With all due respect - I don't think we have enough yet. The spec is >>> still unstable. >> >> Specific wording aside, Alexis, it's a fine time to be talking about >> these ideas, right? > > I don't wish to diss Bob's push in this direction. But I'd like to > see the topic model 'settle down' before looking at content. I don't > believe we are there yet.
Gotcha. That's fine. I think everyone wants things to move slowly. This is the first I've seen of Bob's ideas in this direction and I've got to let it marinate in my brain a bit. But I'd imagine some new concerns about the existing spec may fall out of it, which is probably a good thing, even if we all collectively decide that they should or should not be in scope. -Brett
