Hi,

 Had a few thoughts on potential add-ons. (with business usecases in
mind).

 These definitely fall outside the basic spec and may not be as
technically sound, and that's why i would appreciate some critique.

 1. Can Hubs be engineered to understand the message-content they
handle? If hubs are made content-aware (atleast through meta-
information/tags if not the entire content, keeping in mind security
constraints), they could double up as yellow-pages. This would enable
them to project themselves on their "reach" to other hubs in a
distributed topology, or to publishers so that publishers put their
best foot forward, offerings-wise, before linking with a given hub.
Subscribers could further state their interest in topic-categories on
Hubs and this would give further useful information to potential
publishers to adapt their business offerings accordingly.

 2. Is there any activity in the pipeline to evolve a standard set of
objects per business, now that there are (widely used)Hubs? Are Hubs a
nice place to enforce standards in business objects that pass through
them? (having a series of "superset" business objects, with
standardized field definitions per business, would reduce so much
effort in basic data-mapping, later in the ESBs.)

 3. Is there a directory to discover Hubs? Alternately, instead of
having exclusive directories, why not place a mini-directory inside
each hub/select hubs pointing to local hubs? This is analogous to
asking around for directions on the way to a place and leaving a trail
of knowledge on the way, rather than reaching a centralized board
displaying directions. If there were knowledge-based Hubs, the
knowledge-bank of each hub would keep increasing this way.

 The gist is -- can one add a business dimension to this?


Regards,
Niranjan

Reply via email to